Jump to content

Talk:Salvia divinorum/GA2

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

GA Reassessment

[edit]

Article (edit | visual edit | history) · Article talk (edit | history) · Watch
The Salvia divinorum article does not deserve its GA status for a number of reasons:

  • It is US-centric
  • It has dead external links
  • At 140kb it may too long, although the refs take up a lot of space.
  • Breaking the article into the plant and the drug topics (as per cannabis) is probably a good idea. The drug use is likeley to be of more interest to readers than the botanical information.
  • Having seperate section for UK and US news refs seems odd.
  • There is an overuse of section headings
  • The "Heat gun vaporizing" needs copy editing, reads like a how to guide and mentions a device that may be non-notable and goes unexplained.

I have recently split Legal status of Salvia divinorum in the United States aout of Legal status of Salvia divinorum since the latter also suffered from systemic bias. -- Alan Liefting (talk) - 18:59, 30 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Most of the concerns seem to have been addressed based on the history. As such I'm closing this as kept; if you disagree then open up a community reassessment so others can provide opinions. Wizardman Operation Big Bear 18:30, 29 August 2011 (UTC)[reply]