Talk:Salman Aristo/GA1
GA Review
[edit]| GA toolbox |
|---|
| Reviewing |
Article (edit | visual edit | history) · Article talk (edit | history) · Watch
Reviewer: Grapple X (talk · contribs) 21:05, 18 August 2012 (UTC)
GA review – see WP:WIAGA for criteria
- Is it reasonably well written?
- A. Prose quality:
- B. MoS compliance for lead, layout, words to watch, fiction, and lists:
- Grand for the most part. However, short films should be italicised rather than quoted (borne out by WP:'', which is just a wonderful shortcut). I also think that filmography is brief enough that it could be tabled, feel free to disagree though.
- A. Prose quality:
- Is it factually accurate and verifiable?
- A. References to sources:
- B. Citation of reliable sources where necessary:
- C. No original research:
- A. References to sources:
- Is it broad in its coverage?
- A. Major aspects:
- B. Focused:
- Good enough; some more personal rather than professional info might be useful but I understand that it can be hard to come by.
- A. Major aspects:
- Is it neutral?
- Fair representation without bias:
- Fair representation without bias:
- Is it stable?
- No edit wars, etc:
- No edit wars, etc:
- Does it contain images to illustrate the topic?
- A. Images are tagged with their copyright status, and valid fair use rationales are provided for non-free content:
- B. Images are provided where possible and appropriate, with suitable captions:
- N/A; might not be the worst idea to throw in something a bit more loosely connected like File:Andrea Hirata.jpg or even File:Brownies with chocolate chunks.jpg just to break up the text there.
- A. Images are tagged with their copyright status, and valid fair use rationales are provided for non-free content:
- Overall:
- Pass or Fail:
- Not a lot to be done, I'm sure you'll be fine to deal with it. On hold for now. Sorry you had to wait so long for this, you should have told everyone there was brownies involved. GRAPPLE X 21:05, 18 August 2012 (UTC)
- Pass or Fail:
- I put the one of Hirata in, as it has more to do with Aristo's career. Thanks for the review! — Crisco 1492 (talk) 00:33, 19 August 2012 (UTC)
- Looks good. I italicised what was needed, too. I don't know what you think of a table or not but I'm going to pass it now either way; you can decide to leave it or add it at your leisure. Well done. GRAPPLE X 01:05, 19 August 2012 (UTC)