Talk:Sally Kirkland

This article must adhere to the biographies of living persons (BLP) policy, even if it is not a biography, because it contains material about living persons. Contentious material about living persons that is unsourced or poorly sourced must be removed immediately from the article and its talk page, especially if potentially libellous. If such material is repeatedly inserted, or if you have other concerns, please report the issue to this noticeboard.

If you are a subject of this article, or acting on behalf of one, and you need help, please see this help page.

This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale.
It is of interest to the following WikiProjects:

Biography: Actors and Filmmakers

	Biography portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Biography, a collaborative effort to create, develop and organize Wikipedia's articles about people. All interested editors are invited to join the project and contribute to the discussion. For instructions on how to use this banner, please refer to the documentation.BiographyWikipedia:WikiProject BiographyTemplate:WikiProject Biographybiography articles
	This article is supported by WikiProject Actors and Filmmakers (assessed as Mid-importance).

Pennsylvania Low‑importance

	Pennsylvania portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Pennsylvania, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Pennsylvania on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.PennsylvaniaWikipedia:WikiProject PennsylvaniaTemplate:WikiProject PennsylvaniaPennsylvania articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Philadelphia Low‑importance

	Philadelphia portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Philadelphia, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Philadelphia on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.PhiladelphiaWikipedia:WikiProject PhiladelphiaTemplate:WikiProject PhiladelphiaPhiladelphia articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.
	This article has been automatically rated by a bot or other tool because one or more other projects use this class. Please ensure the assessment is correct before removing the `\|auto=` parameter.

Religion: New religious movements Low‑importance

	Religion portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Religion, a project to improve Wikipedia's articles on Religion-related subjects. Please participate by editing the article, and help us assess and improve articles to good and 1.0 standards, or visit the wikiproject page for more details.ReligionWikipedia:WikiProject ReligionTemplate:WikiProject ReligionReligion articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.
	This article is supported by New religious movements work group (assessed as Mid-importance).

Women

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Women, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of women on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.WomenWikipedia:WikiProject WomenTemplate:WikiProject WomenWikiProject Women articles

Picture

Is no better picture available? — Preceding unsigned comment added by 62.0.113.203 (talk) 01:41, 24 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Kirkland Institute for Implant Survival Syndrome

I've removed the link again. No offense is intended. I'm sure that this institute is important to her, but it needs to be demonstrated with a verifiable, reliable source. Then the institute could be mentioned in the body of the article itself, and references given to both the source and to the institute itself. Linking to the institute from the External links section without any mention of it elsewhere looks like an attempt at promotion, which goes against WP:EL and WP:SPAM. --Ronz 17:28, 12 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]

(Removed) This link is important to Sally Kirkland's life work. I am restoring it. Ronz, please leave me alone. (Removed). Thank you. Ilena 17:46, 12 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]

If that's the way you feel about people trying to help you then maybe it's time to start taking everyone's advise to heart - Wikipedia is not a place for your hostility. --Ronz 21:37, 12 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Ilena, if you cannot support your edits with verifiable resources, then you will forever see your edits be removed. It's nothing personal. It's how editing on wikipedia is done. I've given you detailed guidance on how to get the content you want into this article. I'm sorry that you've chosen to attack me rather than take my help for what it is. --Ronz 22:01, 12 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]

I've updated the references slightly. It still needs a verifiable source, and any editor has full right to remove the institute link until supporting source is added. --Ronz 22:10, 12 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]

is this link useful? http://www.the-vu.com/kirkland.htm I'm not sure if it is a reliable source but it does seem to be written by an independant party. David D. (Talk) 06:25, 16 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Actually looking a little more, it does not seem much more than a place where anyone can publish a piece. Not sure if this is useful for wikipedia. Anyone heard of this site before? David D. (Talk) 06:27, 16 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]

I've removed the link. Ilena maintains the website, so by her including it she violated WP:COI and WP:SPAM. --Ronz 16:54, 15 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]

I went ahead and switched it to an external link. -- Dēmatt (chat) 18:02, 15 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]

The arguments above still stand, plus the more times it's added without addressing the issues above, the more it looks promotional. --Ronz 19:31, 15 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]

I went through that, too, then I did a Google search and the Institute does exist,[1],[2], [3]. It seems to be part of Sally Kirkland's life. The question then became, why not link it? I couldn't come up with a good reason. -- Dēmatt (chat) 19:49, 15 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]

I concur. There is no good reason to delete it now. -- Levine2112 ^discuss 02:44, 16 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]

I disagree. See my previous arguments. We could use better sources for verification, and it would be better to introduce it as a properly sourced reference rather than an external link. --Ronz 21:20, 18 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Hi, as I read this article it's about her movie career. So my question is about the external links. The only one that I see that might be appropriate is the last one. Her fight about breast implants, don't they belong somewhere else? I also have to agree with Ronz on why they should be deleted, sorry. --Crohnie 13:43, 1 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Sorry misread the last paragraph about her activities about breast implants. I still think that the two external links should be removed. --Crohnie 14:02, 1 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]

I think the IMDB link is pretty useful since it is being kept up to date. I might be wrong, but I think it's fairly standard to include IMDB for actors. --Ronz 15:57, 1 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]

What sources are needed?

I have a lot of information and background on Ms Kirkland. I am not sure what sources are being requested to take the questionability away from this article. If someone would specifically let me know what is needed I feel certain I can locate the information and references. She has been the subject of much press and several articles have been written about her that I have access to. Thank you. I look forward to working here to make this a fine, encyclopeia article. Ilena 18:27, 29 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Mass Rapid Transit (Singapore) is an example of a well-sourced article. --Ronz 00:42, 30 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Academy nominee

Her status as an academy nominee is not in doubt. But the whole category is being deleted so there is no point trying to revert the bot. See the discussion here. David D. (Talk) 18:33, 29 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]

I see. Thanks. Ilena 19:34, 29 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]

External links

Just a question since I am just learning the rules here. Shouldn't the external links be removed? It was brought to my attention when I first started here about the arbitration going on with Barrett Vs Rosenthal. The external links have the Humantic Foundation through out the links plus Ms. Rosenthal said she was the one doing the websites. Is there another link that can be used without all of this? --Crohnie 13:16, 25 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]

It's tricky. On one hand, Ilena added the links against COI and after she said she was going to find ways to add websites to wikipedia that link to her website. If she ever tries to edit this again, there should probably be some attention brought to the situation. On the other hand, it does appear to be her official site. The Institute is another matter, being so far nothing than a page where it appears Ilena is just promoting herself and her agendas in Kirkland's name. --Ronz 15:34, 25 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks, I understand, I appreciate you taking the time to answer my question.--Crohnie 15:37, 25 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]

With the arbitration over, should the external links now be deleted? --Crohnie 20:44, 27 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]

My thoughts exactly. It's time to cleanup after the mess. --Ronz 23:11, 27 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]

The other two also link to that site. Is there a site where the external links do not show up? --Crohnie 16:24, 28 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]

I don't think we have a choice about the official site given WP:EL, "Articles about any organization, person, web site, or other entity should link to the official site if any." I don't have any doubts that it is her official site.

I think the link to the Internet Movie Database should be kept as well. It's pretty much an accepted standard for cases like this. --Ronz 16:35, 28 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Fashion sense

"In recent years, Kirkland's fashion sense has gained a cult following and raised eyebrows." I removed this from the article because it's unsourced and could be taken as ridicule. Per WP:BLP I don't think it should be reintroduced. -- Ronz 00:35, 18 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Sally Kirkland. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20140502211533/http://digicoll.library.wisc.edu/cgi/f/findaid/findaid-idx?c=wiarchives;view=reslist;subview=standard;didno=uw-whs-tape00339a to http://digicoll.library.wisc.edu/cgi/f/findaid/findaid-idx?c=wiarchives;view=reslist;subview=standard;didno=uw-whs-tape00339a

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 13:54, 9 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]