Talk:Saleyards Creek
This article was nominated for deletion on 15 March 2010 (UTC). The result of the discussion was keep. |
This article is rated Stub-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Notability
[edit]Can a storm drain really be considered notable? Is this anything more than a gutter? --Gimme danger (talk) 04:53, 4 June 2008 (UTC)
Depends on whether it is really a water course. A lot of natural watercourses in developed cities have been tuned into "drains". A good example is the Tank Stream, also in Sydney. It is very significant, being the colony's first water supply, but is essentially a drain today. Maybe Saleyards Creek is just a drain, or maybe the opening line is inaccurate and it has a history that should be in Wikipedia. For example, why is it called "Saleyards"? John Dalton (talk) 01:18, 16 December 2008 (UTC)
claims in article from Mason Park report
[edit]Canalisation of the stream has affected salinity and pollution levels in nearby tidal wetlands.[4] I can't see where exactly the report refers to Salesyards Creek and its specific relation to these issues. LibStar (talk) 05:20, 16 March 2010 (UTC)
- See pages 16, 19, 21 & 63. -- Radagast3 (talk) 05:38, 16 March 2010 (UTC)
- Stub-Class Australia articles
- Low-importance Australia articles
- Stub-Class New South Wales articles
- Low-importance New South Wales articles
- WikiProject New South Wales articles
- Stub-Class Sydney articles
- Low-importance Sydney articles
- WikiProject Sydney articles
- WikiProject Australia articles
- Stub-Class River articles
- Low-importance River articles