Talk:Salamandridae

	Salamandridae is part of WikiProject Amphibians and Reptiles, an effort to make Wikipedia a standardized, informative, comprehensive and easy-to-use resource for amphibians and reptiles. If you would like to participate, you can choose to edit this article, or visit the project page for more information.Amphibians and ReptilesWikipedia:WikiProject Amphibians and ReptilesTemplate:WikiProject Amphibians and Reptilesamphibian and reptile articles
Mid	This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale.

Requested move

True Salamander → Salamandridae – Not only is it improperly capitalised (since it refers to a higher taxon), but the family includes newts as well as the true salamanders (indeed, more newts than salamanders). There is no common name for this taxon, which should therefore be at the scientific name. I'm only prevented from doing it myself by the two-line edit history at Salamandridae. --Stemonitis 13:20, 4 May 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Done. —Nightst a llion (?) ^{Seen this already?} 09:02, 9 May 2006 (UTC)[reply]

This is a horrible page

The entire page it taken up by a list and has almost no data at all on the subject. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 76.184.241.144 (talk) 20:11, 23 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Capitalization

I started lowercasing species names per WT:CAPS; someone asked me to put a note here that I'm doing it, so here it is. ErikHaugen (talk | contribs) 23:59, 20 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Taxobox

shouldn't Caudata be the clade not the order which appears to be Urodela? Bodrugan (talk) 15:08, 20 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Depends on the source. Amphibian Species of the World uses Caudata as the order, as do ITIS. In any case, there is currently a discussion about what source(s) we should use in this project, so any change at this level should better wait until some conclusion is reached. Micromesistius (talk) 16:31, 20 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks Bodrugan (talk) 10:28, 26 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Molge

Do taxonomic articles have a standard way of addressing former genera? For example, Molge meridionalis redirects to Notophthalmus meridionalis, yet there doesn't seem to be anything else in Wikipedia mentioning the (apparently) former genus Molge, if someone tried to look that up. I'm sure there are other examples, but I happened to check Molge because of its notable appearance in a P. G. Wodehouse novel. RCTodd (talk) 16:38, 26 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

It is possible to mention, or, better yet, discuss why one taxon was subsumed/synonymized into another taxon if we can find the appropriate source that discusses that situation. Scholar.google and books.google are two good places to start.--Mr Fink (talk) 17:16, 26 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Salamandridae. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20060722104126/http://www.tylototriton.org/ to http://www.tylototriton.org/

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 11:03, 10 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]