Talk:Sakura (Tsubasa: Reservoir Chronicle)/GA1

GA Review

Article (edit | visual edit | history) · Article talk (edit | history) · Watch

Reviewer: Johanna (talk · contribs) 19:42, 7 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Second on my "to review" list. Johanna (formerly BenLinus1214)^{talk to me!}_{see my work} 19:42, 7 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks. I'll give my best.Tintor2 (talk) 22:39, 7 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Comments

Infobox and Lead

Instead of putting her two appearances on different lines, put "Tsubasa: Reservoir Chronicle and xxxHolic character" as it is in the article Frasier Crane, Addison Montgomery, and other characters who appear in multiple series.
Be sure the lead follows the structure of the article (i.e. earlier sections come first in the lead). If you find that that doesn't make sense, change the section layout instead.
Are there two characters named Sayoran in two different mangas? If so, specify this.

Creation and conception

"the characters of Osamu Tezuka" upon first reading, it appears that Osamu Tezuka is a character to those of us who don't know any better. :) I would replace it with "the characters created by Osamu Tezuka"
Also, how are they similar to each other? Is this sourced?
What's an OVA?
"Makino pointed…" Do you mean "pointed out"?

Character outline

Why exactly are the chapter titles in French?
Just a question: why is there a big jump in references between chapters 32 and 145?
How did Fei-Wang die exactly?
Does the anime series make any changes to her storyline?

Reception

It should probably be "popular among readers" not "within"
Who was she second to in the first poll? In the second poll, what rank was she and who was she behind?
I might place this rankings stuff at the end of the section, as this is more typical.
"Megan Lavey initially called" Could you elaborate a bit on her opinions? It's a bit unclear what she was getting at right now.

References

Refs 44 and 50 are dead.

@Tintor2: Nice article and nice writing! I was expecting to have a lot of comments on the plot summary, but it was quite well written! Clear this up and you'll be set to go. :) Johanna (formerly BenLinus1214)^{talk to me!}_{see my work} 02:49, 10 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

I've done some work and:

I moved the creation section per WP:Lead.
Is it okay to write "pointed out."? I mean it's a phrasal verb.
I would add the original Syaoran in the lead but the character is introduced in the second half of the series.
Found an archive ref 50. I don't know which one is ref 44 after moving the article's lead.
The anime doesn't go anywhere and is followed by the original video animations
The manga in both Japanese and English uses the word Chapitre.

@BenLinus1214: Tintor2 (talk) 14:59, 10 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

@Tintor2: The old ref 44 is now ref 56 (animage). Other than that, I can definitely pass. Johanna (formerly BenLinus1214)^{talk to me!}_{see my work} 16:25, 10 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Never mind, I found an archive-url quickly. Pass. Johanna (formerly BenLinus1214)^{talk to me!}_{see my work} 16:28, 10 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

GA review (see here for what the criteria are, and here for what they are not)

It is reasonably well written.
a (prose, no copyvios, spelling and grammar): b (MoS for lead, layout, word choice, fiction, and lists):
It is factually accurate and verifiable.
a (reference section): b (citations to reliable sources): c (OR):
It is broad in its coverage.
a (major aspects): b (focused):
It follows the neutral point of view policy.
Fair representation without bias:
It is stable.
No edit wars, etc.:
It is illustrated by images and other media, where possible and appropriate.
a (images are tagged and non-free content have fair use rationales): b (appropriate use with suitable captions):
Overall:
Pass/Fail:

Thanks.Tintor2 (talk) 16:28, 10 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]