Jump to content

Talk:Saint Kitts and Nevis at the 2012 Summer Olympics

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Good articleSaint Kitts and Nevis at the 2012 Summer Olympics has been listed as one of the Sports and recreation good articles under the good article criteria. If you can improve it further, please do so. If it no longer meets these criteria, you can reassess it.
Good topic starSaint Kitts and Nevis at the 2012 Summer Olympics is part of the Saint Kitts and Nevis at the Olympics series, a good topic. This is identified as among the best series of articles produced by the Wikipedia community. If you can update or improve it, please do so.
Article milestones
DateProcessResult
October 24, 2017Good article nomineeListed
April 9, 2018Good topic candidatePromoted
March 29, 2022Good topic removal candidateDemoted
August 8, 2023Good topic candidatePromoted
Current status: Good article

GA Review

[edit]
GA toolbox
Reviewing
This review is transcluded from Talk:Saint Kitts and Nevis at the 2012 Summer Olympics/GA1. The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.

Reviewer: MWright96 (talk · contribs) 06:27, 23 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Will be reviewing this article as part of a GAN sweep. Comments will appear soon. MWright96 (talk) 06:26, 23 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

  1. It is reasonably well written.
    a (prose): b (MoS for lead, layout, word choice, fiction, and lists):
  2. It is factually accurate and verifiable.
    a (reference section): b (citations to reliable sources): c (OR):
  3. It is broad in its coverage.
    a (major aspects): b (focused):
  4. It follows the neutral point of view policy.
    Fair representation without bias:
  5. It is stable.
    No edit wars, etc.:
  6. It is illustrated by images and other media, where possible and appropriate.
    a (images are tagged and non-free content have fair use rationales): b (appropriate use with suitable captions):
  7. Overall:
    Pass/Fail:

Lead

[edit]

Background

[edit]
  • Wikilink opening to the 2012 Summer Olympics opening ceremony and closing to the 2012 Summer Olympics closing ceremony
  • You use Saint Kitts and Nevis and St. Kitts and Nevis throughout the article. Only one of these should be used for consistency

Athletics

[edit]
  • All mentions of"100 m" and its variants need to be spelt as for example "100 metres" in the prose
  • "He was disqualified during the semifinals heat." - Is there any information available to state why he was disqualified? Was it a false start?
    • I checked harder this time and still did not find anything. I was even looking for videos of the event to see if I could figure it out. Do you have any source on it by chance? Kees08 (Talk)
  • "which was not high enough to advance to the next round" - change to which was not fast enough to advance them to the next round
  • "and it was announced July 29 that she would not compete" - reword to and it was announced on July 29 that she would not compete
  • Wikilink the World Anti-Doping Agency
  • "While the drug is not listed as prohibited by the World Anti-Doping Agency, it falls into the category of veterinary medicine and is therefore prohibited." - repition of prohibited

References

[edit]
  • The reflist needs to have a colwidth set at 30em
  • The publishers of the citations need to be wikilinked where possible
  • Remove the external links section as it is not appropriate to have just solely the navbox inside of it

Can see the GA potential in this but it will be put on hold until all of the above points have been actioned. MWright96 (talk) 13:52, 23 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]