Talk:Saint Kenelm

	Anglo-Saxon England portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Anglo-Saxon Kingdoms, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Anglo-Saxon Kingdoms on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Anglo-Saxon KingdomsWikipedia:WikiProject Anglo-Saxon KingdomsTemplate:WikiProject Anglo-Saxon KingdomsAnglo-Saxon Kingdoms articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Saints Low‑importance

	Saints portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Saints, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Saints and other individuals commemorated in Christian liturgical calendars on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.SaintsWikipedia:WikiProject SaintsTemplate:WikiProject SaintsSaints articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Biography: Royalty and Nobility

	Biography portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Biography, a collaborative effort to create, develop and organize Wikipedia's articles about people. All interested editors are invited to join the project and contribute to the discussion. For instructions on how to use this banner, please refer to the documentation.BiographyWikipedia:WikiProject BiographyTemplate:WikiProject Biographybiography articles
	This article is supported by WikiProject Royalty and Nobility.

Middle Ages Low‑importance

	Middle Ages portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Middle Ages, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of the Middle Ages on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Middle AgesWikipedia:WikiProject Middle AgesTemplate:WikiProject Middle AgesMiddle Ages articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

England Low‑importance

	England portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject England, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of England on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.EnglandWikipedia:WikiProject EnglandTemplate:WikiProject EnglandEngland-related articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Rating

Whoever rated this article 'Start-Class' needs to get real about the availability of data about saxon saints. The entry summarises virtually all known information about this figure.

--John Price 11:47, 10 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Cenelm of Mercia

Cenelm of Mercia was an historical figure, known only through official documents. His identification as the saint is problematic as the two life stories have several discrepancies, not least the age at death. Merging the articles is therefore not a good idea.

--John Price 11:54, 10 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Is there any doubt among historians that the St Kenelm and the Ætheling Cynehelm are the same person? I couldn't find any dissenting views, but I didn't look very hard. Angus McLellan (Talk) 13:34, 10 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]

I think the question is, is St kenelm a hsitoric figure at all? In any case, historic records indicate that Cynehelm lived to a much greater age than the saint so it seems they cannot have been the same person.

--[1] 20:13, 13 March 2007 (UTC)

Eight or nine churches

Worcestershire Places of Worship: St Kenelm, Clifton upon Teme states 8 churches dedicated to St. Kenelm. SU0003 : Hinton Parva: parish church of St. Kenelm states that there are 9. So although there are more churches pictured in the article than many similar saints articles, I think that as there are only 8 or 9 it does no harm to have a picture of each displayed. If they are not to be listed down the right hand side of the article then I think they should be displayed in a gallery at the bottom. -- PBS (talk) 11:35, 18 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]

We have seven so far. I see no harm in having them, but agree it would be inappropriate for St Peter or St Mary, who are the dedicatee for 1000s of them. Peterkingiron (talk) 16:19, 19 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]

see Commons:Category:Saint Kenelm churches in England -- PBS (talk) 00:55, 20 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]

There are eight now - I think is the full list of Anglican Churches, there are also two Roman Catholic Churches called Our Lady and St Kenelm, these are at Stow in the Wold and Halesowen. I have taken the liberty of moving these to a gallery and giving them a section of their own.John Price (talk) 10:59, 3 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 2 external links on Saint Kenelm. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 14:16, 2 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]