Talk:Saint Jerome in His Study (Dürer)
Appearance
This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||||||||||
|
Missing philological reference
[edit]User:Johnbod -- would you please provide a source (Wikipedia page or external resource) for your assertion on the historical record? There is a know confessional difference in scriptural attributions: Roman Catholics and Protestants differ on their allegorical, anagogical and tropological senses of scripture, as I noted in Nicholas_of_Flüe#Visionary_images. I'm obviously not the history-of-art expert you appear to be from your contributions, but would not a little humility serve the wider Wikipedia audience better? An attestation to the public authorized opinions of another expert, even one who shares you preference for literal interpretation, would add rather than detract surely. MrsKrishan (talk) 20:39, 26 February 2012 (UTC)