Talk:Saint Andrew in Romania
Appearance
This article is rated C-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
3rd century BC
[edit]The first paragraph talks of Christian artefacts dated to 300 years before Christ!— Preceding unsigned comment added by 78.147.70.219 (talk • contribs)
- Yes, I have erased that claim since it is ludicrous. Tgeorgescu (talk) 17:19, 30 November 2016 (UTC)
George Alexandrou and St. Andrew history
[edit]It is a WP:FRINGE or WP:QS pilgrimage testimonial written by a non-scholar. Nowhere Alexandrou claims to be a historian. Tgeorgescu (talk) 22:26, 10 February 2015 (UTC)
This article is biased and wrong
[edit]It says it is a legend with no evidence while there are early historical sources supporting it mentioned in the second paragraph but disregarded for no reason. You may as well delete the page because it is worthless. 86.26.36.10 (talk) 00:09, 27 November 2023 (UTC)
- This is a mainstream encyclopedia. Our article is biased for mainstream history, see WP:CHOPSY. tgeorgescu (talk) 02:06, 27 November 2023 (UTC)
- You mean it's biased towards protestantism since the universities mentioned on that page are primarily in protestant countries, so it's biased against orthodoxy. In other words, this page is anti-Orthodox propaganda by design, camouflaged as "biased for mainstream history". 86.26.36.10 (talk) 10:04, 27 November 2023 (UTC)
- If you think that Protestant (and Catholic, and perhaps Jewish) mainstream Bible scholars rubber-stamp church dogma, you're dead wrong. tgeorgescu (talk) 23:32, 27 November 2023 (UTC)
- You mean it's biased towards protestantism since the universities mentioned on that page are primarily in protestant countries, so it's biased against orthodoxy. In other words, this page is anti-Orthodox propaganda by design, camouflaged as "biased for mainstream history". 86.26.36.10 (talk) 10:04, 27 November 2023 (UTC)