Talk:Saddle Creek Records

This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the Saddle Creek Records article.
This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject.

Put new text under old text. Click here to start a new topic.
New to Wikipedia? Welcome! Learn to edit; get help.

Article policies

Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL

This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale.
It is of interest to the following WikiProjects:

United States: Nebraska Low‑importance

	United States portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject United States, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of topics relating to the United States of America on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the ongoing discussions. Template Usage Articles Requested! Become a Member Project Talk Alerts United StatesWikipedia:WikiProject United StatesTemplate:WikiProject United StatesUnited States articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.
	Nebraska portal This article is supported by WikiProject Nebraska.
	This article has been automatically rated by a bot or other tool because one or more other projects use this class. Please ensure the assessment is correct before removing the `\|auto=` parameter.

Record Labels

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Record Labels, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of record labels on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Record LabelsWikipedia:WikiProject Record LabelsTemplate:WikiProject Record Labelsrecord labels articles
???	This article has not yet received a rating on the project's importance scale.

The following references may be useful when improving this article in the future:

untitled

WHy is there a section on bands adn then other bands?

I agree, this seems very odd. I'd vote they be merged unless the original author can explain why they're done in this manner.

They seem to be bands no longer on the label, so I labelled them as such. Elvrum 19:55, 29 April 2006 (UTC)[reply]

I added a discography section, it still is incomplete, help is welcome. Machina82 11:57, 10 Auguss 2006 (UTC)

Vinyl & MP3 Download

Releases #94 and #99 LP's both include a 'ticket' to allow for MP3 download of album from Saddle Creek website. Perhaps include this in the discography?, as you are effectively getting 2 formats for price of 1 (LP & MP3). I don't know of any other SC releases that have this, but it looks like something they may continue to do... and it's great for ipod owning vinyl lovers.

--born against 11:42, 8 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]

LBJ-92 was the same... Saddle Creek calls it "Digital Vinyl". LBJ-92 and LBJ-99 both came with bonus tracks on the LP releases. LBJ-94 came with a code for a bonus MP3 download. RobLinwood 01:29, 14 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Confusing Statement?

"On online music services, the record label does not allow full song streaming on demand."
I'm not sure what this actually means?, where this information comes from?, or the reasoning behind it?. Saddle Creek offer plenty of streaming from their own web site, so do they place restrictions on streaming through other services? --born against 11:49, 8 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Agreed, this is overly vague and doesn't serve much purpose. Moonty 20:33, 13 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]

I also agree, and removed it RobLinwood 01:26, 14 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Bands

I'm pretty sure Neva Dinova isn't on Saddle Creek records, but I can't verify this. I know they were on CRANK! and Sidecho Records, but I can't verify what label they are on now.

Neva Dinova is listed on the roster at [1]. Moonty 15:05, 14 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]

I'm pretty sure Elliott Smith never did anything with Saddle Creek.

1993

Did Conor Oberst start this label when he was 13 years old? —Preceding unsigned comment added by 24.21.208.45 (talk) 07:17, 17 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]