Talk:Sadae

Korea Low‑importance

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Korea, a collaborative effort to build and improve articles related to Korea. All interested editors are invited to join the project and contribute to the discussion. For instructions on how use this banner, please refer to the documentation.KoreaWikipedia:WikiProject KoreaTemplate:WikiProject KoreaKorea-related articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.
	This article is supported by one or more inactive working groups.

Hanja

The currently listed hanja are 史臺 but shouldn't they be 事大 ? Heroeswithmetaphors (talk) 20:39, 20 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Use of the term in north korea

http://books.google.com/books?id=UpZWfYqiVLMC&pg=PA46#v=onepage&q&f=false

Rajmaan (talk) 05:06, 30 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 2 external links on Sadae. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 02:54, 8 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Merge sadaejuui

The following discussion is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section. A summary of the conclusions reached follows.

To not merge sadae and sadaejuui; distinct concepts. Klbrain (talk) 12:32, 24 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]

I know nothing about the topic beyond what I read in the articles, but the distinction between sadae and sadaejuui seems like a WP:POVFORK. The sources do not support the contention that sadaejuui is pejorative and sadae is not; it seems more likely that sadae may be used pejoratively or neutrally, and that adding the juui makes it explicitly pejorative. An English analogy would be the difference between "vision" and "the vision thing". The two prominent editors on both pages are @Caspian blue: and @Enkyo2: who both stopped editing some years ago. jnestorius^(talk) 13:38, 8 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Oppose. Entirely different terminology. It would be a bit like merging imperialism and foreign aid as essentially same thing. – Finnusertop (talk ⋅ contribs) 12:42, 12 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose Sadae is a form of foreign relations, and Sadaejuui is an ideology or an attitude. The latter roughly equivalates to "(cultural) toadyism / flunkyism". --Brett (talk) 19:57, 14 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed merge of Sadaejuui into Sadae

Largely overlapping content. Also probably better discussed together. Daask (talk) 19:44, 3 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Noting that the arguments against this, from 2018, still seem valid; hence weak oppose. Klbrain (talk) 15:04, 27 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.