Talk:Sacred Cod/GA1

GA Review

Article (edit | visual edit | history) · Article talk (edit | history) · Watch

Reviewer: Vaibhavgupta1989 (talk · contribs) 11:15, 17 June 2012 (UTC)

GA Review

Hello! Please remove red links from the article. Looks like well-written and well-structured article. Detailed analysis coming up next week. All the best! Vaibhavgupta1989 (talk) 11:15, 17 June 2012 (UTC)

Hi. thanks for committing to review this article. According to the linking section in the manual of style red links are absolutely fine in an article as long as there is a real chance the article will be created in the future and that the future article is significant to the article at hand. The one redlink I have, the Plymouth Land Company fulfills these criteria.--Found5dollar (talk) 12:18, 17 June 2012 (UTC)

Hi, Needed your comment for the red links. I wanted to make sure that it wasn't a dead link or a wrongly put up link.Vaibhavgupta1989 (talk) 18:37, 17 June 2012 (UTC)

1. Is it reasonably well written?

   A. Prose quality:

   Quality of article is good.

   B. MoS compliance for lead, layout, words to watch, fiction, and lists:

   MoS compliant.

2. Is it factually accurate and verifiable?

   A. References to sources:

   This section is good.

   B. Citation of reliable sources where necessary:

   Each statement has at least one reliable reference.

   C. No original research:

   No original research found.

3. Is it broad in its coverage?

   A. Major aspects:

   All major aspects of the topic are covered.

   B. Focused:

   Article remains focused on the topic throughout.

4. Is it neutral?

   Fair representation without bias:

   No bias found.

5. Is it stable?

   No edit wars, etc:

   Article is stable.

6. Does it contain images to illustrate the topic?

   A. Images are copyright tagged, and non-free images have fair use rationales:

   No problem with images

   B. Images are provided where possible and appropriate, with suitable captions:

   Appropriate Images provided

7. Overall:

   Pass or Fail: Pass 17 June 2012

   Listing it under Arts and architecture Section

Comments

Well written article. Good Job.Vaibhavgupta1989 (talk) 17:43, 17 June 2012 (UTC)