Talk:Sacred Cod/GA1
Appearance
GA Review
[edit]GA toolbox |
---|
Reviewing |
Article (edit | visual edit | history) · Article talk (edit | history) · Watch
Reviewer: Vaibhavgupta1989 (talk · contribs) 11:15, 17 June 2012 (UTC)
GA Review
[edit]Hello! Please remove red links from the article. Looks like well-written and well-structured article. Detailed analysis coming up next week. All the best! Vaibhavgupta1989 (talk) 11:15, 17 June 2012 (UTC)
- Hi. thanks for committing to review this article. According to the linking section in the manual of style red links are absolutely fine in an article as long as there is a real chance the article will be created in the future and that the future article is significant to the article at hand. The one redlink I have, the Plymouth Land Company fulfills these criteria.--Found5dollar (talk) 12:18, 17 June 2012 (UTC)
- Hi, Needed your comment for the red links. I wanted to make sure that it wasn't a dead link or a wrongly put up link.Vaibhavgupta1989 (talk) 18:37, 17 June 2012 (UTC)
- Is it reasonably well written?
- Is it factually accurate and verifiable?
- A. References to sources:
- This section is good.
- B. Citation of reliable sources where necessary:
- Each statement has at least one reliable reference.
- C. No original research:
- No original research found.
- A. References to sources:
- Is it broad in its coverage?
- A. Major aspects:
- All major aspects of the topic are covered.
- B. Focused:
- Article remains focused on the topic throughout.
- A. Major aspects:
- Is it neutral?
- Fair representation without bias:
- No bias found.
- Fair representation without bias:
- Is it stable?
- No edit wars, etc:
- Article is stable.
- No edit wars, etc:
- Does it contain images to illustrate the topic?
- A. Images are copyright tagged, and non-free images have fair use rationales:
- No problem with images
- B. Images are provided where possible and appropriate, with suitable captions:
- Appropriate Images provided
- A. Images are copyright tagged, and non-free images have fair use rationales:
- Overall:
- Pass or Fail: Pass 17 June 2012
- Listing it under Arts and architecture Section
- Pass or Fail: Pass 17 June 2012
Comments
[edit]Well written article. Good Job.Vaibhavgupta1989 (talk) 17:43, 17 June 2012 (UTC)