Jump to content

Talk:Sacred Cod/GA1

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

GA Review

[edit]

Article (edit | visual edit | history) · Article talk (edit | history) · Watch

Reviewer: Vaibhavgupta1989 (talk · contribs) 11:15, 17 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]

GA Review

[edit]

Hello! Please remove red links from the article. Looks like well-written and well-structured article. Detailed analysis coming up next week. All the best! Vaibhavgupta1989 (talk) 11:15, 17 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Hi. thanks for committing to review this article. According to the linking section in the manual of style red links are absolutely fine in an article as long as there is a real chance the article will be created in the future and that the future article is significant to the article at hand. The one redlink I have, the Plymouth Land Company fulfills these criteria.--Found5dollar (talk) 12:18, 17 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Hi, Needed your comment for the red links. I wanted to make sure that it wasn't a dead link or a wrongly put up link.Vaibhavgupta1989 (talk) 18:37, 17 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]
  1. Is it reasonably well written?
    A. Prose quality:
    Quality of article is good.
    B. MoS compliance for lead, layout, words to watch, fiction, and lists:
    MoS compliant.
  2. Is it factually accurate and verifiable?
    A. References to sources:
    This section is good.
    B. Citation of reliable sources where necessary:
    Each statement has at least one reliable reference.
    C. No original research:
    No original research found.
  3. Is it broad in its coverage?
    A. Major aspects:
    All major aspects of the topic are covered.
    B. Focused:
    Article remains focused on the topic throughout.
  4. Is it neutral?
    Fair representation without bias:
    No bias found.
  5. Is it stable?
    No edit wars, etc:
    Article is stable.
  6. Does it contain images to illustrate the topic?
    A. Images are copyright tagged, and non-free images have fair use rationales:
    No problem with images
    B. Images are provided where possible and appropriate, with suitable captions:
    Appropriate Images provided
  7. Overall:
    Pass or Fail: Pass 17 June 2012
    Listing it under Arts and architecture Section

Comments

[edit]

Well written article. Good Job.Vaibhavgupta1989 (talk) 17:43, 17 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]