Talk:Sacramento Book Collectors Club

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Books. To participate in the project, please visit its page, where you can join the project and discuss matters related to book articles. To use this banner, please refer to the documentation. To improve this article, please refer to the relevant guideline for the type of work.BooksWikipedia:WikiProject BooksTemplate:WikiProject BooksBook articles

Organizations Low‑importance

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Organizations, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Organizations on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.OrganizationsWikipedia:WikiProject OrganizationsTemplate:WikiProject Organizationsorganization articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

California Low‑importance

	California portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject California, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of the U.S. state of California on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.CaliforniaWikipedia:WikiProject CaliforniaTemplate:WikiProject CaliforniaCalifornia articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

[Untitled]

This article should not be speedily deleted for lack of asserted importance because...This is an important literary organization based in Sacramento that was founded in 1939 Artfoxsac (talk) 22:17, 10 March 2015 (UTC)Artfoxsac (talk) 22:15, 10 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]

@Artfoxsac: Well I do try and save articles wherever I can, and in this case I can see there is an article in the Sacramento Bee that gives an in-depth report into the club. However, the article as it stands reads too much like an advertisement and were I to find additional sources to prove the club's notability, I fear I would pretty much have to rewrite the article completely from scratch, which is a shame. Sorry. Ritchie333 ^(talk) ^(cont) 22:28, 10 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]