Talk:Sachtler

Brands Low‑importance

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Brands, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of brands on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.BrandsWikipedia:WikiProject BrandsTemplate:WikiProject BrandsBrands
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Germany Low‑importance

	Germany portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Germany, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Germany on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.GermanyWikipedia:WikiProject GermanyTemplate:WikiProject GermanyGermany
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Photography Low‑importance

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Photography, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of photography on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.PhotographyWikipedia:WikiProject PhotographyTemplate:WikiProject PhotographyPhotography
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

hangon

It is not only promotion. As Sachtler is worldwide acknowledged company, it might be interesting and useful for Broadcasters, Camera Operators, Camera men etc. to get more information about Sachtler. The article on Sachtler also has a right to be on wikipedia just as other companies like Vinten or Arri. In my opinion the article is not written in a promotive style. Please let me know, which parts of the article you think are too promotive. It is also published in other Wikipedia versions like the german or spanish one. Thank you! kaddy9

It reads like pure promotion literature to me. Huw Powell (talk) 04:34, 27 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]

The hangon needs to be on the article, i have put it there for you. To save the article you need to prove wp:notability read through that and you should be able to save your article, good luck mark nutley (talk) 13:24, 7 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]

For instance, a quick google gave me this good ref] use stuff like this to prove notability mark nutley (talk) 13:26, 7 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]

I have added further references. One shows, that Sachtler even won a technical Oscar.kaddy9 09:05, 8 April 2010 —Preceding unsigned comment added by 95.90.3.140 (talk)

I've declined the speedy deletion to allow you and others chance to improve the article. It could still be nominated for deletion at article for deletion. Peter 09:30, 8 April 2010 (UTC)

It's still pretty poor. I came here from steadicam, where there is a promotional section for this company. Huw Powell (talk) 04:34, 27 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]