Talk:Sabyasachi Chakrabarty

	Biography portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Biography, a collaborative effort to create, develop and organize Wikipedia's articles about people. All interested editors are invited to join the project and contribute to the discussion. For instructions on how to use this banner, please refer to the documentation.BiographyWikipedia:WikiProject BiographyTemplate:WikiProject Biographybiography
	This article is supported by WikiProject Actors and Filmmakers.

India: West Bengal Low‑importance

	India portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject India, which aims to improve Wikipedia's coverage of India-related topics. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page.IndiaWikipedia:WikiProject IndiaTemplate:WikiProject IndiaIndia
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.
	This article is supported by WikiProject West Bengal (assessed as Low-importance).
	This article was last assessed in May 2012.

Requested move

The following discussion is an archived discussion of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. Editors desiring to contest the closing decision should consider a move review. No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the move request was: moved. Jenks24 (talk) 11:48, 10 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Sabyasachi Chakraborty → Sabyasachi Chakrabarty – Relisted. Jenks24 (talk) 12:26, 23 October 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Requested spelling is being used by

Current spelling is being used by

The move request is being made.
Best,
Tito Dutta ✉ 03:45, 7 October 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Not convinced on this one - ["Sabyasachi Chakraborty" -wikipedia -llc cinema] gets 76x, same with proposed spelling 6x. Unless there's a good other reason, or explanation why the 76x are wrong? In ictu oculi (talk) 00:42, 17 October 2012 (UTC)[reply]

1) Notable newspapers are using the spelling! 2) it is peculiar, for wife and son's article we are using one spelling for surname, for man's surname we are using another spelling. One may say people of one family may use different surname spelling, but, I don't think it is applicable here! --Tito Dutta (talk) 02:54, 17 October 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Sorry not enough evidence to support, but don't oppose either

Times of India is notable, but not WP:IRS reliable/consistent on English spelling of Bengali names. site:http://articles.timesofindia.indiatimes.com "Sabyasachi Chakrabarty" has 182x, Chakraborty 125x.

site:http://www.telegraphindia.com "Sabyasachi Chakrabarty" 58x, "Sabyasachi Chakraborty" 351x.

Our surname article is at Chakraborty, his wife and son probably should be too. However they aren't, and I agree about the inconsistency in family. In ictu oculi (talk) 23:32, 23 October 2012 (UTC)[reply]

(edit conflict) Make sure you are searching the exact phrase using quotes etc (like "Query"). If those newspapers don't have the option, you can search like this: "Query" site:example.com -Wikipedia

Replace example.com with site URL.

I have seen some people mention about number of search results in Google. That is not always a good point. It is one of the most asked questions in Google Web Search Forum. You search with anything and get 150,000 etc results. Now browse to page 6 (i.e. 6*20=120 results in general settings, you'll start getting all irrelevant results and more surprisingly you may get the message "No more result to show, try a new search?". As in here not too many results of the first page are relevant. Also note, like Wikipedia alternative name spelling etc redirect other sites too use catch all or catch alternatives. That means when you search with alternative spelling, you get the same website results there. Can you show me 3-4 Times of India etc newspapers article where the current spelling is used? --Tito Dutta (talk) 23:54, 23 October 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Here are [site:http://articles.timesofindia.indiatimes.com "Sabyasachi Chakraborty"] 125x In ictu oculi (talk) 01:29, 24 October 2012 (UTC)[reply]

I can see only 4 results in that page using the search box! --Tito Dutta (talk) 08:33, 24 October 2012 (UTC)[reply]

I would like to go for Chakrabarty as i found that his wife and sons have articles using same. We should make it same. and we can list chakraborty for redirection. -- Nizil (talk) 19:04, 25 October 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Support The evidence is mixed, but consistency with his family members is desirable. I'd probably also support a move to change them to Chakraborty, but that's not the question before us. --BDD (talk) 17:55, 30 October 2012 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on this talk page or in a move review. No further edits should be made to this section.

Birth date

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I was about to add Sabyasachi Chakrabarty's birth date when I saw the comment stating that the source cannot be a blog, iMDb or a "public record". The problem with that is, all of the websites I found containing his birth date are one of these three, I think. Plus, the whole internet has the unanimous opinion that his birth date is on (1956-09-08)8 September 1956 and his age is 68 years. Should I add the date to the page?

Thank you. I'm Here to Help You (talk) 03:07, 28 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

If you don't have a reliable source, then no. NinjaRobotPirate (talk) 02:17, 29 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]