Talk:Sabena Flight 548

A fact from this article was featured on Wikipedia's Main Page in the On this day section on February 15, 2021.

This article is within the scope of the Aviation WikiProject. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the project and see lists of open tasks and task forces. To use this banner, please see the full instructions.AviationWikipedia:WikiProject AviationTemplate:WikiProject Aviationaviation articles

This article has been checked against the following criteria for B-class status:
Referencing and citation: criterion not met Coverage and accuracy: criterion met Structure: criterion met Grammar and style: criterion met Supporting materials: criterion met

This article is supported by the Aviation accident project.

Belgium High‑importance

	Belgium portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Belgium, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Belgium on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.BelgiumWikipedia:WikiProject BelgiumTemplate:WikiProject BelgiumBelgium-related articles
High	This article has been rated as High-importance on the project's importance scale.

Death Low‑importance

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Death, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Death on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.DeathWikipedia:WikiProject DeathTemplate:WikiProject DeathDeath articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Disaster management High‑importance

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Disaster management, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Disaster management on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Disaster managementWikipedia:WikiProject Disaster managementTemplate:WikiProject Disaster managementDisaster management articles
High	This article has been rated as High-importance on the project's importance scale.

Figure Skating High‑importance

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Figure Skating, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of figure skating-related articles on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Figure SkatingWikipedia:WikiProject Figure SkatingTemplate:WikiProject Figure SkatingFigure skating articles
High	This article has been rated as High-importance on the project's importance scale.

New York City Low‑importance

	New York City portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject New York City, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of New York City-related articles on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.New York CityWikipedia:WikiProject New York CityTemplate:WikiProject New York CityNew York City articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Untitled

In the article, it is stated that this was the only Sabena crash ever, which does not correspond well with this article: Sabena_OO-AUB_Ostende_crash --Turbothy 13:57, 4 January 2006 (UTC)[reply]

It also states that it was the first 707 to crash... according to the link given at the bottom of the article, it was the 4th... so who do I trust, Wikipedia or the references?

The three previous crashes were all during training or test ([1], [2], [3]). This was the first 707 to crash while in normal service. --Turbothy 10:04, 9 January 2006 (UTC)[reply]

I've added the crash box that should be on every accident page, and also removed the phrase that it was notable *because* the US figure skating team was on board. All crashes where 73 people die are inherently notable, even if there weren't any Americans or athletes on board at all.

I'm also not sure why 90% of the information is about the American figure skating team and not the accident itself. Edited to add: I'm not even sure why this should be a "figure skating" page at all. It's an article about a plane crash. Perhaps there should be a separate page about the 1961 American figure skating team, and this article should deal with the accident only? --Charlene 08:54, 28 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Sorry to belabour this article, but I noticed a minor error that I've corrected. It said that the FAA investigated the accident. This is problematic because a) the FAA didn't exist in 1961, so the info is wrong, b) the FAA doesn't investigate plane crashes these days (the NTSB, which does, is independent of the FAA), c) the Department of Transport has no file in their historical collections online for this accident, which makes me think that the CAB (the NTSB's predecessor) didn't investigate this, and d) Belgium had an air investigations branch at the time, and the aircraft was Belgian. I'm guessing the Belgians did the investigation, but perhaps the CAB assisted since this was the first commercial accident of an American-built aircraft model.

If we had access to the actual Aircraft Accident Report, this would clear things up immensely. --Charlene 09:10, 28 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]

As to why this article talks about figure skating, and not just the actual accident: The crash was a very notable event in the history of figure skating. It caused the cancellation of the World Championships that year. It not only wiped out a whole generation of American athletes, but almost all the top American coaches as well, and was therefore responsible for bringing foreign coaches like Carlo Fassi and John Nicks to the U.S. When I've seen news articles, TV features, or book references about this crash some 40+ years later, it's always been in the context of figure skating. I agree that any plane crash that kills 73 people is "notable", but figure skating is the reason why this one is still the subject of so much interest long after the fact.

BTW, most of the skaters who were killed in the crash already have bio articles, so I don't really see much point in a separate article about the whole team, too. It's not like the main crash article is so long it needs to be broken up. Dr.frog 17:54, 28 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Agreed. An article on a plane crash would be incomplete without information on the long-term ramifications of the crash. The disruption of the American figure skating program is significant and highly relevant; it would be redundant to have a separate article on that topic. Powers ^T 14:02, 30 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]

MOS issue

The Manual of Style indicates that we should avoid links within the bolded subject text in the first sentence (i.e., Sabena Flight 548 instead of Sabena Flight 548). I tried to revise the lead to remove that link and incorporate it elsewhere but haven't found anything that feels natural. Any thoughts? Powers ^T 14:03, 30 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]

how about now? István 05:30, 14 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]

US team flying as a group

I can recall one specific post-1961 incident where the entire US Figure Skating Team did fly together on the same plane as a group. Immediately following the 1996 World Figure Skating Championships in Edmonton, there was a USFSA-sponsored pro-am competition at Matthews Arena in Boston. All of the U.S. athletes reportedly flew from Edmonton to Boston on the same flight. See, for instance, [4]. Dr.frog 12:11, 29 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Kennedy Family Category Proposal

I have an idea I wish to propose. Since one of the skaters, Dudley Richards, was a friend of both John F. Kennedy and his brother Ted Kennedy, I was thinking of placing this article in the 'Kennedy Family' category or at least in the categories established for both Kennedy brothers. Would this be appropriate? Or does anyone else have other suggestions?

And003 (talk) 01:28, 5 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Dudley Richards was not a member of the Kennedy family. I do not think anyone on the plane was a member of the Kennedy family. Just because this article mentions the Kennedy family does not mean it is about the Kennedy family. Dr.frog (talk) 02:38, 5 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Casualties

Normal practice on accident articles is only to list passengers who were notable and sadly this aircraft has a few, but those without a linked wikipedia article should really be removed and the totals summarised in a table. Not sure that the skaters needs to be grouped by discipline. MilborneOne (talk) 12:33, 15 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Blame

it was forced to cancel its final approach to the Brussels airport, as a small plane had not yet cleared the runway.

Was the other plane at fault? This ought to be logged. Valetude (talk) 22:39, 9 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Not likely that the official accident report would have laid blame on the previous landing aircraft, for not having cleared the runway. Even if the pilot of that plane had somehow been negligent in a way that caused him to be on that runway too long, that couldn't be considered as Nexus to why the plane crashed. The Sabena pilots were attempting to conduct a missed approach, which is a normal maneuver called for under such circumstance. If they lost control of their plane, because something went wrong with the plane's control systems, that could not possibly have been related to the location of another plane on the ground.EditorASC (talk) 22:53, 2 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Sabena Flight 548. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit User:Cyberpower678/FaQs#InternetArchiveBot*this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

Added archive http://web.archive.org/web/20110216124920/http://www.rise1961.com:80/about-the-film/ to http://www.rise1961.com/about-the-film/

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{Sourcecheck}}).

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—^{cyberbot II}_{Talk to my owner:Online} 15:25, 2 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]