Talk:Sabbath Rest Advent Church

This article was nominated for deletion on 17 January 2012 (UTC). The result of the discussion was keep.

Christianity Mid‑importance

	Christianity portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Christianity, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Christianity on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.ChristianityWikipedia:WikiProject ChristianityTemplate:WikiProject ChristianityChristianity articles
Mid	This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale.

Seventh-day Adventist Church

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Seventh-day Adventist Church, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Seventh-day Adventist Church on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Seventh-day Adventist ChurchWikipedia:WikiProject Seventh-day Adventist ChurchTemplate:WikiProject Seventh-day Adventist ChurchSeventh-day Adventist Church articles

???

This article has not yet received a rating on the project's importance scale.

To-do list:
edit history watch purge Expand "Glacier View Controversy" section, to include more background, history, theological issues, and details of the Glacier View meeting itself Add to "Adventist Responses to Criticisms" section, ideally with material from Adventist scholars etc.

[Untitled]

This page should not be deleted because it is an important component in church history.

Ewroitsch (talk) 14:19, 7 July 2011 (UTC) ew[reply]

This article will be improved within the next few days (references, etc.).

Rmorstadt (talk) 14:28, 7 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]

This article is not written from a neutral point of view. -- œ ^™ 08:57, 26 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Edits, March 2012

PTtrans, the way I see it there are two sources which partly contradict each other, and for now I think they have to stand side by side. It is reasonable to assume, for instance, that the Handbuch is making a general statement about the church that they think applies broadly, whereas the statements in the Siegener Zeitung interview may be read as pertaining to Dickendorf. But such hypothesizing isn't really necessary, since I hope my phrasing indicates where the difference is. For now, there is little choice but to accept the authority of the Handbuch and to find, at the same time, a reasonable place for the comments by Dura himself. Happy days, Drmies (talk) 04:30, 5 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]

https://it.wikipedia.org/wiki/Chiesa_avventista_del_riposo_sabatico

https://it.wikipedia.org/wiki/Chiesa_avventista_del_riposo_sabatico — Preceding unsigned comment added by 79.25.135.242 (talk) 17:36, 15 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

https://it.wikipedia.org/wiki/Chiesa_avventista_del_riposo_sabatico

https://it.wikipedia.org/wiki/Chiesa_avventista_del_riposo_sabatico — Preceding unsigned comment added by 79.20.57.153 (talk) 21:26, 8 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Article does not meet quality or neutrality standards.

This article is biased, poorly written and repeats the same content several times. Making a recommendation to rewrite. Nanoic (talk) 19:39, 16 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]