Talk:SWORD (protocol)

Untitled

Potential Conflict of Interest: As the creator of this page, I declare a conflict of interest. I am the current Community Manager for the SWORD project, and have been actively involved with SWORD since its inception. However, SWORD is a relatively mature standard, having been in existence for 4+ years, has been implemented in all major scholarly repository systems, and has many implementations such as the Microsoft Word Authoring add-in created by Microsoft, I trust that the content is acceptable, true, and accurate, and is not intended to promote my personal work, but that of the SWORD protocol.StuartLewis (talk) 23:50, 26 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Feedback

It looks fine and you can put it in mainspace under SWORD (Protocol). My main comment about the content is that it would be useful to add an example showing an Atom document suitable for posting to a Sword server. Also, it will help avoid some notability-related flak if you can cite some journal articles about the protocol (see WP:GNG) rather than just implementation info. 67.122.209.190 (talk) 02:24, 27 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Oh nice, it is already there :) —Preceding unsigned comment added by 67.122.209.190 (talk) 02:24, 27 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for the comment much appreciated - it has links to two peer-reviewed journal articles: Julie Allinson, Sebastien François, Stuart Lewis (2008-01-30), SWORD: Simple Web-service Offering Repository Deposit, Ariadne, http://www.ariadne.ac.uk/issue54/allinson-et-al/ and Stuart Lewis, Leonie Hayes, Vanessa Newton-Wade, Antony Corfield, Richard Davis, Scott Wilson (2009), If SWORD is the answer, what is the question? Use of the Simple Web service Offering Repository Deposit protocol, 'Program' Emerald, http://hdl.handle.net/2292/5315. StuartLewis (talk) 06:40, 27 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]

BibApp?

Hi, all. The link (http://bibapp.org/) to BibApp doesn't look like it has anything to do with SWORD. Okay to remove? Emjackson42 (talk) 16:28, 17 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Actually it looks like a couple of the links out to clients are not working, so I'm going to remove. Please feel free to add back or ping me if there's a reason it should still exist. Thanks. Emjackson42 (talk) 16:46, 17 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]