Talk:STS-74
| This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the STS-74 article. This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject. |
Article policies
|
| Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL |
 | STS-74 was one of the Natural sciences good articles, but it has been removed from the list. There are suggestions below for improving the article to meet the good article criteria. Once these issues have been addressed, the article can be renominated. Editors may also seek a reassessment of the decision if they believe there was a mistake. | |||||||||||||||
| ||||||||||||||||
| Current status: Delisted good article | ||||||||||||||||
 | This article is rated B-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||
| |||||||||||
Article tense issue
[edit]The main body of the article is in a time warp, discussing the mission in the future tense, which probably indicates it was cut and pasted from some old source.StanislavJ 03:31, 16 November 2006 (UTC)
Not any more! Colds7ream 16:55, 16 February 2007 (UTC)
good article
[edit]this has passed as a good article under the good article criteria. as I know little about space, i can't really say what to improve in the article Themcman1 17:19, 6 March 2007 (UTC)
GA Sweeps
[edit]This article has been reviewed as part of Wikipedia:WikiProject Good articles/Project quality task force. I believe the article currently meets the criteria and should remain listed as a Good article. The article history has been updated to reflect this review. Regards, Malleus Fatuorum (talk) 01:34, 16 June 2008 (UTC)
External links modified (January 2018)
[edit]Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified one external link on STS-74. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
- Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20130927193648/http://www-pao.ksc.nasa.gov/kscpao/status/stsstat/1995/nov/11-20-95.htm to http://www-pao.ksc.nasa.gov/kscpao/status/stsstat/1995/nov/11-20-95.htm
When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.
This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).
- If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
- If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.
Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 17:12, 22 January 2018 (UTC)
GA Reassessment
[edit]The following discussion is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.
- Article (edit | visual edit | history) · Article talk (edit | history) · Watch • • Most recent review
- Result: Delisted. ~~ AirshipJungleman29 (talk) 22:14, 31 January 2024 (UTC)
This 2007 listing is predominantly uncited, failing GA criterion 2b). ~~ AirshipJungleman29 (talk) 03:11, 25 January 2024 (UTC)
- Delist Yep. Schierbecker (talk) 01:21, 28 January 2024 (UTC)