Talk:STS-31
 | This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||
| |||||||||||
Other Shuttle
[edit]In the [1] picture on the STS-31 page, there is another shuttle on a different launchpad as Discovery takes off. Which shuttle is that?
![[1]](https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Image:STS31_carries_Hubble_to_orbit.jpg%7Cpicture){kind=link}
- It's Columbia. Colds7ream 15:09, 24 April 2007 (UTC)
- It would be interesting to know why. Was it safety backup for the Discovery mission similar to the next scheduled Hubble service mission, or was it simply another mission planned in close succession? --AJKGordon 09:56, 22 August 2007 (UTC)
- It was STS-35, originally scheduled to launch on May 16th. There were some problems however, and the launch was eventually postponed to December. 130.234.5.138 (talk) 22:07, 12 May 2009 (UTC)
- It would be interesting to know why. Was it safety backup for the Discovery mission similar to the next scheduled Hubble service mission, or was it simply another mission planned in close succession? --AJKGordon 09:56, 22 August 2007 (UTC)
highest altitude record at that time?
[edit]The apogee was 615 kilometers, I can't find any other Space Shuttle mission during which a higher apogee was attained? So why don't we just write "the higest altitude EVER"?Evilbu 15:10, 13 August 2007 (UTC)
Inline contradiction
[edit]In "Mission Highlights"
The shuttle's orbit in this mission was its second highest orbit up to that date,
next paragraph:
Discovery soared to 600 kilometres (370 mi) – the highest shuttle altitude ever at the time
So is it second highest at the time, or highest ever at the time? -- RJS 12:46, 8 November 2013 (CST) — Preceding unsigned comment added by 107.203.129.22 (talk)
- The second statement is correct. The only other shuttle missions I found that came even close to that altitude before STS-31 were STS-41-C (468 km), STS-51-J (484 km) and STS-33 (519 km). --Jupiter-4 (talk) 09:18, 26 February 2014 (UTC)
External links modified (January 2018)
[edit]Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified one external link on STS-31. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
- Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20120605212956/http://klabs.org/richcontent/general_technology/shuttle_rendezvous_with_hubble.pdf to http://klabs.org/richcontent/general_technology/shuttle_rendezvous_with_hubble.pdf
When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.
This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).
- If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
- If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.
Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 15:47, 21 January 2018 (UTC)