Talk:STS-125/GA1

GA Review

Article (edit | visual edit | history) · Article talk (edit | history) · Watch
Reviewing. Reywas92 ^Talk 21:32, 27 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Well-written

Everything looks great! I went ahead and did copyediting for the article, but there is nothing major.

Factually accurate and verifiable

The article is very well referenced.

Broad in its coverage

I can't think of anything missing.

Neutral

Of course

Stable

Of course

Images

They look great! It makes things so much easier when you know they're all PD. If you want you could stagger them so they're not all on the right side.

Due to issues with Accessibility because almost all the images are under second-level headers, I choose to right-align images in these types of mission articles to avoid problems for those with low vision. Ariel♥Gold 20:10, 30 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]

This is an excellent article! Let me know if there's anything specific you wanted to be looked at. I will pass this as a GA, and I hope to see you at WP:FAC! Reywas92 ^Talk 15:56, 30 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you so much for the fast review, Reywas92! Ariel♥Gold 20:10, 30 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Media

Would it be appropriate to add more videos from the NASA gallery? It seems like a good idea to add at least one video of one of the Spacewalks. --Resplendent (talk) 17:51, 30 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]

I have no problem with that. It's all public domain! Reywas92 ^Talk 18:36, 30 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]

I would just be sure that we don't overwhelm the article with a gallery of videos. That is what the link to commons is for, to direct people where more videos / images are. Ariel♥Gold 20:11, 30 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Of course. I just feel it seems a waste to have a Media section with only one piece of Media in it. (lol) --Resplendent (talk) 21:10, 30 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]