Talk:SS Wyola

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Ships, a project to improve all Ship-related articles. If you would like to help improve this and other articles, please join the project, or contribute to the project discussion. All interested editors are welcome. To use this banner, please see the full instructions.ShipsWikipedia:WikiProject ShipsTemplate:WikiProject ShipsShips articles

Australia: Western Australia / Maritime Low‑importance

	Australia portal SS Wyola is within the scope of WikiProject Australia, which aims to improve Wikipedia's coverage of Australia and Australia-related topics. If you would like to participate, visit the project page.AustraliaWikipedia:WikiProject AustraliaTemplate:WikiProject AustraliaAustralia articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.
	This article is supported by WikiProject Western Australia (assessed as Low-importance).
	This article is supported by WikiProject Australian maritime history (assessed as Low-importance).
	Need help improving this article? Ask a Librarian^{What's this?} at the National Library of Australia, or the State Library of Western Australia.
	The Wikimedia Australia chapter can be contacted via email to helpwikimedia.org.au for non-editorial assistance.

IS or WAS

Resolved

Does Wyola still exist?

If not, the article should probably be written in the past tense (eg not, "Wyola has a beam ..."), and it would be nice to have a sentence indicating when/how she was decommissioned.

If she still exists, the lead sentence should be in the present tense, and - given that a steam tug is not likely to still be in active service - a sentence describing her current state/usage would be nice. Mitch Ames (talk) 12:53, 28 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]

she's the wreck sticking out of the sand on O'Connor beach Gnan garra 15:18, 28 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]

She does still have a beam of 125feet though much of her is under the sand. I havent yet found a source for when that happened though it suppose to have been early 70's Gnan garra 15:23, 28 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Hmmmm, past or present tense. The mixture of the two makes the article hard to read, even if - in at least some cases - it is literally true. But even if she is still a steam powered tug, does her engine still provide her with a speed of 11.5 knots. (Presumably knot, if she's stuck in the sand.) And what of her draft (hull)?

I Google-searched for "ss wyola o'connor beach", and found http://museum.wa.gov.au/sites/default/files/Fremantle.pdf which says "It was ... run ashore at Robb Jetty for dismantling and scrapping in 1970." Mitch Ames (talk) 10:00, 29 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]

I've updated the article to use past tense, and adde a paragraph about her death and burial. Mitch Ames (talk) 11:19, 29 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Awesome thanks Gnan garra 09:33, 30 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Bow or stern

The recent added picture is captioned "Bow ...", but according to the ref, it's the stern. Mitch Ames (talk) 12:28, 31 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]

in the alternative view it just doesnt look like a stern section lets just use the neutral term hull Gnan garra 02:59, 1 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Further reading

IS or WAS

Bow or stern