Talk:SS Mount Temple

Ships C‑class

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Ships, a project to improve all Ship-related articles. If you would like to help improve this and other articles, please join the project, or contribute to the project discussion. All interested editors are welcome. To use this banner, please see the full instructions.ShipsWikipedia:WikiProject ShipsTemplate:WikiProject ShipsShips articles
C	This article has been given a rating which conflicts with the project-independent quality rating in the banner shell. Please resolve this conflict if possible.

Shipwrecks

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Shipwrecks, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of shipwreck-related articles on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.ShipwrecksWikipedia:WikiProject ShipwrecksTemplate:WikiProject ShipwrecksShipwreck articles

???

This article has not yet received a rating on the project's importance scale.

Shipwreck-related priority open tasks:

To Do

Lady Elizabeth (1879)
- Clean up typos Currently working on it-----Completed!
- Improve grammar
- Add any additions if needed Still adding more information
- Discuss desired additions -None

Military history: Maritime / Canadian / North America / World War I C‑class

This article is within the scope of the Military history WikiProject. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the project and see a list of open tasks. To use this banner, please see the full instructions.Military historyWikipedia:WikiProject Military historyTemplate:WikiProject Military historymilitary history articles

C

This article has been rated as C-class on the project's quality scale.

This article has been checked against the following criteria for B-class status:
Referencing and citation: criterion not met Coverage and accuracy: criterion met Structure: criterion met Grammar and style: criterion met Supporting materials: criterion met

Associated task forces:
/
	Maritime warfare task force
	Canadian military history task force
	North American military history task force
	World War I task force

Trains Low‑importance

Trains Portal

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Trains, an attempt to build a comprehensive and detailed guide to rail transport on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, you can visit the project page, where you can join the project and/or contribute to the discussion. See also: WikiProject Trains to do list and the Trains Portal.TrainsWikipedia:WikiProject TrainsTemplate:WikiProject Trainsrail transport articles

Low

This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

This article lacks references.

An editor has requested that an image or photograph be added to this article.

Canada: History Low‑importance

	Canada portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Canada, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Canada on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.CanadaWikipedia:WikiProject CanadaTemplate:WikiProject CanadaCanada-related articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.
	This article is supported by WikiProject History of Canada.

Coodinates?

What are the coordinates of the wreck site? --Ragemanchoo82 (talk) 05:12, 15 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Canadian or British

It was British, but was lost in the war belonging to one of Canada's largest companies. Should it be Canada / British? Since Canada is recognized for its contributions independently of Britain in WWI (Vimy Ridge, Somme, etc.) it seems this loss belongs to Canada's Merchant Marine. Anyone disagree? — Preceding unsigned comment added by Varaldarade (talk • contribs) 02:46, 17 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]

grammar

She was first ships that responded to the distress signals of the RMS Titanic in 1912.

I thing think this should be either "She was the first ship" or "She was among the first ships"? — Preceding unsigned comment added by 69.140.167.14 (talk) 12:13, 19 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Ship was never Canadian

Even at the time of her loss she was still sailing under British flag and had a registry in Liverpool. It was never sold to Canada (as in Canadian government), it was sold to CPR, a private company, with 13 other ships. If noone opposes I will remove the Canadian registry from the infobox. Crook1 (talk) 18:34, 14 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]

@Crook1: It had said "United States", with a US flag for almost 4 years, nobody says anything. It's corrected to Canada, as CPR is a Canadian company, and 4 minutes later people complain... - wolf 18:52, 14 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]

@Thewolfchild: I was not here until last year. But the fact remains the ship was always sailing under UK flag and has nothing really to do with Canada. CPR is a Canadian company, but registered all their ships in Britain, so the ship is really British.Crook1 (talk) 19:01, 14 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]

@Crook1: Nothing against you, I just thought the timing was odd. Anyway, do you have a source for the registry and flagging after the sale to CPR? - wolf 19:11, 14 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]

@Thewolfchild: I just added the page to the watchlist recently as I wanted to update it. LLoyd's from 1904 and up lists her as British with a port of registry in Liverpool.Crook1 (talk) 19:17, 14 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]

@Crook1: If you can add that source to any changes you make, it's fine by me. On another note, I just took a look at the first dozen or so ships at List of ships of CP Ships, and there appears to be some inconsistencies with the countries and flags used in the infoboxes. You might want to check that out if you're updating/correcting these ship articles. (fyi) Have a nice day - wolf 19:37, 14 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]

@Thewolfchild: Most of these ships listed are RMS vessels so their government flag would be correct since they carried mail for the UK government. Didn't see any other problems. The list is obviously incomplete.Crook1 (talk) 20:13, 14 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]

I just came across the list looking for this ship (which didnt seem to be on it). Just thought I'd point it out, as it seemed to fit your interests. I usually do more naval than civilian, so I"ll leave you to it. - wolf 20:20, 14 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]