Talk:SS Cayuga/GA1

GA Review

Article (edit | visual edit | history) · Article talk (edit | history) · Watch

Reviewer: Lectrician2 (talk · contribs) 23:27, 29 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Edit's Needed to proceed with final review

The lead section does not comply with Wikipedia:Manual of Style/Lead section as it is not what would be considered concise. You essentially copy and pasted the part about it's final voyage from the "Final voyage" section. The lead section should be a summary, not a full on article. I would also like you make the section on the rescue of the ship in the lead section more concise.

In the History Service History section it states "She cost $250,000 (equivalent to $6.62 million in 2019) to build." This does not seem very applicable to service history, and instead should be placed in the design and construction section of history.

In the History Service History section it states "In November 1891, Cayuga collided with the wooden package freighter Delaware off Cheboygan, Michigan." This is somewhat of a stub section of a paragraph, and I would like to see more info here, but if there isn't anymore info to find, I understand.

Final Review

Rate	Attribute	Review Comment
1. Well-written:
	1a. the prose is clear, concise, and understandable to an appropriately broad audience; spelling and grammar are correct.	Pass.
	1b. it complies with the Manual of Style guidelines for lead sections, layout, words to watch, fiction, and list incorporation.	Pass.
2. Verifiable with no original research:
	2a. it contains a list of all references (sources of information), presented in accordance with the layout style guideline.	Pass.
	2b. reliable sources are cited inline. All content that could reasonably be challenged, except for plot summaries and that which summarizes cited content elsewhere in the article, must be cited no later than the end of the paragraph (or line if the content is not in prose).	Pass.
	2c. it contains no original research.	Pass.
	2d. it contains no copyright violations or plagiarism.	Pass.
3. Broad in its coverage:
	3a. it addresses the main aspects of the topic.	Pass.
	3b. it stays focused on the topic without going into unnecessary detail (see summary style).	Pass.
	4. Neutral: it represents viewpoints fairly and without editorial bias, giving due weight to each.	Pass.
	5. Stable: it does not change significantly from day to day because of an ongoing edit war or content dispute.	Pass.
6. Illustrated, if possible, by media such as images, video, or audio:
	6a. media are tagged with their copyright statuses, and valid non-free use rationales are provided for non-free content.	Pass.
	6b. media are relevant to the topic, and have suitable captions.	Pass.
	7. Overall assessment.	Great job! You just made SS Cayuga a good article!