Talk:SR Brașov

Fair use rationale for Image:FC-Brasov.png

Image:FC-Brasov.png is being used on this article. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is no explanation or rationale as to why its use in Wikipedia articles constitutes fair use. In addition to the boilerplate fair use template, you must also write out on the image description page a specific explanation or rationale for why using this image in each article is consistent with fair use.

Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to insure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If there is other other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on the other images used on this page. Note that any fair use images uploaded after 4 May, 2006, and lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.BetacommandBot 06:19, 4 June 2007 (UTC)

Fair use rationale for Image:FC-Brasov.png

Image:FC-Brasov.png is being used on this article. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is no explanation or rationale as to why its use in this Wikipedia article constitutes fair use. In addition to the boilerplate fair use template, you must also write out on the image description page a specific explanation or rationale for why using this image in each article is consistent with fair use.

Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to insure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If there is other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on the other images used on this page. Note that any fair use images uploaded after 4 May, 2006, and lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.

BetacommandBot 08:34, 1 October 2007 (UTC)

Players Bozhiqi, Canaj, Minga

Please do not remove these former Albanian internationals, they were part of the team even though their performance was not one of the highest. They went to Romania when they were pushing their thirties, but not for that are they to be excluded. sulmues (talk)--Sulmues 21:42, 18 January 2010 (UTC)

Adding External Link to Liga1 Homepage

Remove links to made for adsense sites, and old blogs which are returning 404. Add link to point to the impartial, factual portal for liga 1 at liga1.gamebookers.com - link should point to club page for relevancy. —Preceding unsigned comment added by Galesbury (talk • contribs) 00:22, 10 March 2010 (UTC)

Dejan Martinović

I believe he has dual nationality, both BIH and CRO, considering some sources say he is from Bosnia and Herzegovina while other say he is Croatian. I think we should follow club's official website which says he is Croatian (CRO), as it was stated in the local press too. Considering he's born in Posušje, a city in Bosnia-Herzegovina, close to the Croatian border it is possible he is also Bosnian. However, I think no emotional debate should be started out from this, as I consider both Croatia and Bosina-Herzegovina deserve respect.

Layout

User:Mortifervm please leave the page as it was at the revision edited by Narcis90 at 19:31, 19 September 2011. There is no reason to move them to a separate page that adds no relevant info. Thanks. BaboneCar (talk) 10:41, 21 September 2011 (UTC)

Issues

What squad number Nuno Viveiros will have was not yet confirmed (nothing on the official website yet), Emanuel Creţulescu is listed on the official website in the Under-19 squad, and the vice-captain thing is an OR issue. BaboneCar (talk) 19:47, 2 October 2011 (UTC)

Requested move 28 June 2021

The following is a closed discussion of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. Editors desiring to contest the closing decision should consider a move review after discussing it on the closer's talk page. No further edits should be made to this section.

---

• SR Brașov → FC Brașov
• FC Brașov → FC Brașov (disambiguation)

– FC Brașov went bankrupt in 2017, instead of them was founded in the same year, SR Brașov, a club founded by the fans of FC Brașov, as a phoenix club. The club was enrolled in the fourth tier, played in Brașov's original colors (black and yellow) on Brașov's stadium, Stadionul Silviu Ploeșteanu. In December 2019, it was announced that Municipality of Brașov bought FC Brașov brand in the liquidation procedure of the old company, SC FC Brașov SA. Until December 2020, it was clear enough that the Mayor of Brașov and SR are in good relations and the brand will go to SR. In 2021, due to political pressure (from what I understand) the plan changed and the Municipality voted a merge between newly promoted in the second league Corona Brașov and FC Brașov brand, but via another (phantom) club ACS Scotch or something (with no activity, but which has now FC Brașov brand). The Flaggers association (FC Brașov fans) protest now in front of the City Hall, so it is a tense situation.

As a conclusion of this Balkan story, I propose:
1. SR Brașov moved back to FC Brașov (on FC Brașov page will remain the history until 2017, 4 years of inactivity and the rebirth in 2021)
2. SR Brașov page will be a different one and will contain the history of fans-owned club (2017-present)
3. Corona Brașov is absorbed in FC Brașov new project, but not entirely, so I proposed just to appear as dissolved in 2021. FC Brașov on their place in Liga II, but without Corona record (FC Brașov and Corona played both for one season in the Liga I, no logic in having the same record).

References

Rhinen (talk) 10:05, 28 June 2021 (UTC) —Relisted. P.I. Ellsworth  ed. ^put'r there 16:28, 20 July 2021 (UTC)

Note: This discussion has been included in WikiProject Football's list of association football-related page moves. GiantSnowman 10:15, 28 June 2021 (UTC)

Note: FC Brașov has been converted from a redirect and now titles a dab page with significant content, so it is ineligible to be a target "new" title unless it is also proposed to be renamed. This request has been altered to reflect that fact and relisted because the dab page has not had a move request notice. P.I. Ellsworth  ed. ^put'r there 16:28, 20 July 2021 (UTC)

• Oppose page move and instead suggest that we have separate articles on the defunct club which was known as FC Brașov, the new club which was founded in 2017 as SR Brașov, the old club known as CSM Corona Brașov (football), and then whatever the current club is called. If that new club is called 'FC Brașov' then we do what we have done with e.g. Accrington Stanley F.C. (current club) and Accrington Stanley F.C. (1891) (defunct club). GiantSnowman 10:19, 28 June 2021 (UTC)

The new name is FC Brașov Steagul Renaște (which is kind of fun, because SR=Steagul Renaște) for this season and starting with the 2022-23 season will be just FC Brașov. Probably FC Brașov (2021) and FC Brașov (1936) are the best options...Rhinen (talk) 10:47, 28 June 2021 (UTC)

yes, something like that would work. GiantSnowman 11:01, 28 June 2021 (UTC)

• Support this.-- One page for Corona - club dissolved in 2021. One page for SR Brasov - club founded in 2017 as a phoenix club owned by the fans and one page for FC Brasov as legal successor, but with 4 years of inactivity.Florin (talk) 19:18, 28 June 2021 (UTC)

• Support partially - I support moving the page back to FC Brasov but also with the original year (1936), adding Corona as dissolved (for a second time), creating a separate page for the supporters' club, and a new club for the new Brasov. I think the two FC Brasov's should be merged only if there are some court decisions regarding this. Also, I think we should have a general, very serious discussion about the continuity of Romanian football club on WikiProject football, given that there are MANY clubs which have two or even three articles because of dissolvings, refoundings, mergers etc.8Dodo8 (talk · contribs) 13:15, 1 July 2021 (UTC)

The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.