Talk:SO(10)

Please Reference

Please link/provide references to the original papers, review articles and books where this is discussed! That would be more useful to me and other physicists than the summary written here, and it is Wikipedia policy. C9 (talk) 09:32, 26 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Please rename

The article at Pati–Salam model links here as SO(10) unification model. I feel this nomenclature is much clearer than the existing (confusing) title. It helps separate out some of the confusion related to the model not being SO(10), without being overly verbose. Further, doesn't perpetuate the notion that the physics interpretation of SO(10) is somehow different than the mathematical notion. Specifically, it is a model that embeds SO(10) within a spin representation. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 70.247.173.205 (talk) 20:44, 1 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]