Talk:SM UB-13/GA1

GA Review

Article (edit | visual edit | history) · Article talk (edit | history) · Watch

GA review (see here for criteria)

1. It is reasonably well written.

   a (prose): b (MoS): - the sentences in the lede are quite short and staccato, but this is a personal preference that makes me note it, I think...

2. It is factually accurate and verifiable.

   a (references): b (citations to reliable sources): c (OR):

3. It is broad in its coverage.

   a (major aspects): b (focused):

4. It follows the neutral point of view policy.

   Fair representation without bias:

5. It is stable.

   No edit wars etc.:

6. It is illustrated by images, where possible and appropriate.

   a (images are tagged and non-free images have fair use rationales): b (appropriate use with suitable captions): - I'm particularly taken with the three images here; a nice variation between different topics.

7. Overall:

   Pass/Fail: - well done! Shimgray | talk | 19:48, 8 April 2009 (UTC)