Talk:SM U-1 (Austria-Hungary)/GA1
GA Review
[edit]Article (edit | visual edit | history) · Article talk (edit | history) · Watch
Hi there, I am happy to tell you that this article has passed GA without the need for any further improvement. Listed below is information on how the article fared against the Wikipedia:good article criteria, with suggestions for future development. These are not required to achieve GA standard, but they might help in future A-class or FAC review process.
- It is reasonably well written.
- a (prose):
b (MoS):
- a (prose):
- It is factually accurate and verifiable.
- a (references): b (citations to reliable sources): c (OR):
- a (references):
- It is broad in its coverage.
- a (major aspects): b (focused):
- a (major aspects):
- It follows the neutral point of view policy.
- a (fair representation): b (all significant views):
- a (fair representation):
- It is stable.
- It contains images, where possible, to illustrate the topic.
- a (tagged and captioned): b (lack of images does not in itself exclude GA): c (non-free images have fair use rationales):
- a (tagged and captioned):
- Overall:
- a Pass/Fail:
- a Pass/Fail:
Additonal comments
[edit]- The link to Brioni does not go where you intended.
- Whoops. I've fixed that so the link points to Brioni Island. — Bellhalla (talk) 18:40, 25 November 2008 (UTC)
- For an article of this size, the lead is longer than is normal and could be summarised more consisely. However, this is not a significant problem and is only a matter of taste.
- I tightened up the lead a bit so that it's more in line with the length of the article. Thanks again for the suggestions. — Bellhalla (talk) 18:53, 25 November 2008 (UTC)
Thankyou and congratulations, an excellent addition to Wikipedia:Good Articles. All the best.--Jackyd101 (talk) 17:54, 25 November 2008 (UTC)
- Thanks for taking the time to review the article. — Bellhalla (talk) 18:40, 25 November 2008 (UTC)