Talk:SMS Württemberg (1878)/GA1

GA Review

Article (edit | visual edit | history) · Article talk (edit | history) · Watch

Reviewer: Starstriker7 - public^(talk) 08:35, 15 July 2011 (UTC)

I'll take on this review. (I'm on a roll!) --Starstriker7 - public^(talk) 08:35, 15 July 2011 (UTC)

Criterion 1

Lead

• "Her sisterships were" - Her sister ships were
  • Fixed. Parsecboy (talk) 11:32, 15 July 2011 (UTC)

Service history

• As with the other reviews, should I Division and II DIvision be wikilinked?
• Can you wikilink "F-boats"?
• The lead says that the Württemberg was modernized in Kiel, but the service history section says that she was modernized in Danzig.
  • Should be Kiel - was probably looking Bayern's entry. As for F-boats, they're a type of minesweeper, but we don't have an article on them yet. A red link won't hurt though. Parsecboy (talk) 11:32, 15 July 2011 (UTC)

Criterion 2

I'm accepting these refs in good faith, as all of these references are offline. The article is well-referenced, however, and has inline citations and a dedicated ref section.

Criterion 3

The article is broad with regard to its contemporary warship articles and is well-focused too.

Criterion 4

There isn't really a place where the article is not neutral.

Criterion 5

Edit history tells me that this article is stable indeed.

Criterion 6

Both images are documented and valid in terms of copyright status.

Overall comments

Keep it up! As always, a few issues with prose and wikilinks, but nothing much else. --Starstriker7 - public^(talk) 08:45, 15 July 2011 (UTC)

• Should all be fixed. Parsecboy (talk) 11:32, 15 July 2011 (UTC)
  • Looks good. I'm passing the article now. --Starstriker7 - public^(talk) 16:22, 15 July 2011 (UTC)