Talk:SMS Thüringen

This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the SMS Thüringen article.
This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject.

Put new text under old text. Click here to start a new topic.
New to Wikipedia? Welcome! Learn to edit; get help.

Article policies

Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL

SMS Thüringen is a featured article; it (or a previous version of it) has been identified as one of the best articles produced by the Wikipedia community. Even so, if you can update or improve it, please do so.

SMS Thüringen is part of the Battleships of Germany series, a featured topic. This is identified as among the best series of articles produced by the Wikipedia community. If you can update or improve it, please do so.

Article milestones
Date	Process	Result
January 17, 2011	Good article nominee	Listed
February 18, 2011	Good topic candidate	Promoted
August 25, 2011	Good topic candidate	Promoted
December 23, 2012	WikiProject A-class review	Approved
June 8, 2013	Featured article candidate	Promoted
A fact from this article appeared on Wikipedia's Main Page in the "Did you know?" column on January 19, 2011. The text of the entry was: Did you know ... that the German dreadnought battleship SMS Thüringen* destroyed the British armored cruiser HMS Black Prince at the Battle of Jutland?*
Current status: Featured article

Germany Low‑importance

	Germany portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Germany, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Germany on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.GermanyWikipedia:WikiProject GermanyTemplate:WikiProject GermanyGermany articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Military history: Maritime / European / German / World War I / Operation Majestic Titan

This article is within the scope of the Military history WikiProject. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the project and see a list of open tasks. To use this banner, please see the full instructions.Military historyWikipedia:WikiProject Military historyTemplate:WikiProject Military historymilitary history articles

Associated task forces:
/
	Maritime warfare task force
	European military history task force
	German military history task force
	World War I task force
	Operation Majestic Titan (Phase I)

Additional information:
/
	This article has passed an A-Class review.

Ships

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Ships, a project to improve all Ship-related articles. If you would like to help improve this and other articles, please join the project, or contribute to the project discussion. All interested editors are welcome. To use this banner, please see the full instructions.ShipsWikipedia:WikiProject ShipsTemplate:WikiProject ShipsShips articles

Scrapped or Sunk?

Simple Internet searches indicate this ship was scrapped after the war. However, divers are reporting that a wreck of the ship still exists. See: http://www.bobhenneman.info/Thuringenwreck.htm

Thanks, Carl Gusler 22:40, 13 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]

It appears to have been scrapped partially, with the 350 foot section of hull left underwater. I incorporated this info into the text of the article. Hope that helps. Parsecboy (talk) 19:14, 25 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

picture

I think, this picture is not the battleship SMS Thüringen!! I mean, its the cruiser SMS Blücher, because the ship had only two funnels (similar Westphalen-class) and the side turrets are on the main deck. --URTh 09:34, 27. Apr. 2009 (CEST) —Preceding unsigned comment added by 212.122.61.138 (talk) 07:40, 27 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]

That's correct, the photograph is definitely Blücher. This was discovered on Commons a while ago; I thought I had removed it from this article already, but apparently I hadn't. Thanks for pointing it out. Parsecboy (talk) 11:21, 27 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Discrepancy in date of laying keel

In the first paragraph, it cites the keel lay date as Nov 1908. In the paragraph under 'Construction' right below it, it cites it as Nov 1909. Don't know which one is accurate but clearly one is off. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 199.242.0.29 (talk) 19:26, 11 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Just a typo - thanks for catching that. Parsecboy (talk) 19:36, 11 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]