Talk:SMS Sebenico

SMS Sebenico has been listed as one of the Warfare good articles under the good article criteria. If you can improve it further, please do so. If it no longer meets these criteria, you can reassess it.
Review: August 8, 2017. (Reviewed version).

Ships

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Ships, a project to improve all Ship-related articles. If you would like to help improve this and other articles, please join the project, or contribute to the project discussion. All interested editors are welcome. To use this banner, please see the full instructions.ShipsWikipedia:WikiProject ShipsTemplate:WikiProject ShipsShips articles

Military history: Maritime / European

This article is within the scope of the Military history WikiProject. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the project and see a list of open tasks. To use this banner, please see the full instructions.Military historyWikipedia:WikiProject Military historyTemplate:WikiProject Military historymilitary history articles

Associated task forces:
/
	Maritime warfare task force
	European military history task force

GA Review

This review is transcluded from Talk:SMS Sebenico/GA1. The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.

Reviewer: Peacemaker67 (talk · contribs) 03:09, 7 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Might as well make it a hat trick.

This article is in good shape. A few comments from me:

no duplicate links, dabs or redirects
suggest in an unsuccessful attempt to improve ~~the~~her speed.~~of the design~~, as the use of design twice jars a bit
- Good idea
suggest mentioning what sort of guns they were, muzzle or breech loaders?
- Fixed
the gun calibers in the body and infobox don't match, 9 cm vs 87 mm and 7 cm vs 66 mm
- Fixed
where were the 47 mm QF guns installed?
- Added
suggest "included the ironclad"
- Good catch
per the Zara review, I think the image license should be PD-because?
- Yup, fixed there

That's me done, placing on hold for the above to be addressed. Cheers, Peacemaker67 (click to talk to me) 03:21, 7 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks PM. Parsecboy (talk) 12:06, 7 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This article is well-written, verifiable using reliable sources, covers the subject well, is neutral and stable, contains no plagiarism, and is illustrated by an appropriately licensed image with an appropriate caption. Passing. Peacemaker67 (click to talk to me) 04:18, 8 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]