Talk:SMS Salamander (1850)

SMS Salamander (1850) has been listed as one of the Warfare good articles under the good article criteria. If you can improve it further, please do so. If it no longer meets these criteria, you can reassess it.

SMS Salamander (1850) is part of the Avisos of Germany series, a good topic. This is identified as among the best series of articles produced by the Wikipedia community. If you can update or improve it, please do so.

Article milestones
Date	Process	Result
September 7, 2019	Good article nominee	Listed
January 28, 2021	Good topic candidate	Promoted

Current status: Good article

Ships

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Ships, a project to improve all Ship-related articles. If you would like to help improve this and other articles, please join the project, or contribute to the project discussion. All interested editors are welcome. To use this banner, please see the full instructions.ShipsWikipedia:WikiProject ShipsTemplate:WikiProject ShipsShips articles

Military history: Maritime / European / German

This article is within the scope of the Military history WikiProject. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the project and see a list of open tasks. To use this banner, please see the full instructions.Military historyWikipedia:WikiProject Military historyTemplate:WikiProject Military historymilitary history articles

Associated task forces:
/
	Maritime warfare task force
	European military history task force
	German military history task force

GA Review

This review is transcluded from Talk:SMS Salamander (1850)/GA1. The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.

Reviewer: Zawed (talk · contribs) 03:07, 1 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Will look at this one, comments to follow in due course. Zawed (talk) 03:07, 1 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This looks good, the only issue I spotted is:

"the Jade Bay", which was also in the Nix article.
- I think I get into German mode when I'm writing these
Image tag looks OK to me
No dabs
No dupe links

That's it for me. Zawed (talk) 08:40, 7 September 2019 (UTC):Thanks[reply]

Thanks again. Parsecboy (talk) 09:37, 7 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

All good. I am satisfied that this article meets GA criteria. Zawed (talk) 10:25, 7 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Good Article review progress box

Criteria: 1a. prose () 1b. MoS () 2a. ref layout () 2b. cites WP:RS () 2c. no WP:OR () 2d. no WP:CV ()

3a. broadness () 3b. focus () 4. neutral () 5. stable () 6a. free or tagged images () 6b. pics relevant ()

Note: this represents where the article stands relative to the Good Article criteria. Criteria marked are unassessed

Image

Available here from the Illustrated London News c. 1854-1855. Parsecboy (talk) 10:22, 4 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]