Talk:SMS Pommern/GA1
GA Review
[edit]Article (edit | visual edit | history) · Article talk (edit | history) · Watch
Reviewer: Sturmvogel 66 (talk) 03:02, 8 April 2010 (UTC) GA review – see WP:WIAGA for criteria
- Is it reasonably well written?
- A. Prose quality:
- This needs a copy edit. Conversions needed in the infobox. Add your usual note about SKL meaning. How many boilers? Set on fire and blown in half? Both? How badly was Pommern hit at Jutland by the British BCs?
- I'll get to a copy edit tomorrow. I clarified the fire/breaking in half bit. As to the hit by the BCs, I added what information I could from Campbell, but he says that no information on the hit is known, other than that it was made by Indomitable. Parsecboy (talk) 04:04, 8 April 2010 (UTC)
- Alright, I've gone through the article and fixed a number of (rather embarrassing) problems. Guess I was tired when I wrote it :) Parsecboy (talk) 11:32, 8 April 2010 (UTC)
- Boiler, mon ami, boilers! And link to the definition of (8-)point.--Sturmvogel 66 (talk) 03:17, 9 April 2010 (UTC)
- Ahh, yes. Done and done. Parsecboy (talk) 03:27, 9 April 2010 (UTC)
- Boiler, mon ami, boilers! And link to the definition of (8-)point.--Sturmvogel 66 (talk) 03:17, 9 April 2010 (UTC)
- Alright, I've gone through the article and fixed a number of (rather embarrassing) problems. Guess I was tired when I wrote it :) Parsecboy (talk) 11:32, 8 April 2010 (UTC)
- I'll get to a copy edit tomorrow. I clarified the fire/breaking in half bit. As to the hit by the BCs, I added what information I could from Campbell, but he says that no information on the hit is known, other than that it was made by Indomitable. Parsecboy (talk) 04:04, 8 April 2010 (UTC)
- This needs a copy edit. Conversions needed in the infobox. Add your usual note about SKL meaning. How many boilers? Set on fire and blown in half? Both? How badly was Pommern hit at Jutland by the British BCs?
- B. MoS compliance:
- A. Prose quality:
- Is it factually accurate and verifiable?
- A. References to sources:
- B. Citation of reliable sources where necessary:
- C. No original research:
- A. References to sources:
- Is it broad in its coverage?
- A. Major aspects:
- B. Focused:
- A. Major aspects:
- Is it neutral?
- Fair representation without bias:
- Fair representation without bias:
- Is it stable?
- No edit wars, etc:
- No edit wars, etc:
- Does it contain images to illustrate the topic?
- A. Images are copyright tagged, and non-free images have fair use rationales:
- B. Images are provided where possible and appropriate, with suitable captions:
- A. Images are copyright tagged, and non-free images have fair use rationales:
- Overall:
- Pass or Fail:
- Pass or Fail:
Forgot about this until after I promoted it, but please provide conversions for the armor in the infobox.--Sturmvogel 66 (talk) 03:42, 9 April 2010 (UTC)