Jump to content

Talk:SMS Nautilus (1906)/GA1

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

GA Review

[edit]
GA toolbox
Reviewing

Article (edit | visual edit | history) · Article talk (edit | history) · Watch

Reviewer: Anotherclown (talk · contribs) 21:11, 27 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Progression

[edit]
  • Version of the article when originally reviewed: [1]
  • Version of the article when review was closed: [2]

Technical review

[edit]
  • Citations: the citation check tool reveals no errors (no action required)
  • Disambiguations: no dabs - [3] (no action req'd)
  • Linkrot: No dead links - [4] (no action req'd).
  • Alt text: Images lack alt text so you might consider adding it - [5] (no action req'd, not part of the GA criteria / suggestion only)
  • Copyright violations: The Earwig Tool reveals no issues with copyright violations or close paraphrasing [6] (no action req'd).
  • Duplicate links: no duplicate links to be removed (no action req'd).

Criteria

[edit]
  • It is reasonably well written.
    a (prose): b (MoS):
    • Is there a typo here: "hull was launched as Nautilus on 20 August 1906." In the infobox it says launched on 28 August.
      • The 28th is correct, good catch.
    • "... both five miles long..." perhaps use the {{convert}} template here?
      • Good idea.
    • Slightly repetitive prose here: "...Following the disbanding of the unit the following..." (following x 2 in close proximity - perhaps reword one?)
      • Changed the second one to "next".
    • I made a few edits [7].
      • All look fine to me.
  • It is factually accurate and verifiable.
    a (references): b (citations to reliable sources): c (OR):
    • No issues. Article is well referenced and looks to reflect the sources available on this vessel.
  • It is broad in its coverage.
    a (major aspects): b (focused):
    • All major aspects seem to be covered.
    • Article is focused and doesn't go into unnecessary detail.
  • It follows the neutral point of view policy.
    a (fair representation): b (all significant views):
    • No issues.
  • It is stable.
    No edit wars etc.:
    • No issues.
  • It contains images, where possible, to illustrate the topic.
    a (tagged and captioned): b (Is illustrated with appropriate images): c (non-free images have fair use rationales): d public domain pictures appropriately demonstrate why they are public domain:
    • Images are appropriate for article and appear to be PD / free and have the req'd documentation.
    • Captions look ok.