Talk:SMS Lika

SMS Lika has been listed as one of the Warfare good articles under the good article criteria. If you can improve it further, please do so. If it no longer meets these criteria, you can reassess it.
Review: April 16, 2019. (Reviewed version).

Military history: Maritime / Balkan / European / World War I

This article is within the scope of the Military history WikiProject. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the project and see a list of open tasks. To use this banner, please see the full instructions.Military historyWikipedia:WikiProject Military historyTemplate:WikiProject Military historymilitary history articles

Associated task forces:
/
	Maritime warfare task force
	Balkan military history task force (c. 500–present)
	European military history task force
	World War I task force

Ships

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Ships, a project to improve all Ship-related articles. If you would like to help improve this and other articles, please join the project, or contribute to the project discussion. All interested editors are welcome. To use this banner, please see the full instructions.ShipsWikipedia:WikiProject ShipsTemplate:WikiProject ShipsShips articles

Austria Low‑importance

	Austria portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Austria, an attempt to build a comprehensive and detailed guide to articles about Austria on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please join the project.AustriaWikipedia:WikiProject AustriaTemplate:WikiProject AustriaAustria articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

GA Review

This review is transcluded from Talk:SMS Lika/GA1. The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.

Reviewer: Parsecboy (talk · contribs) 12:10, 9 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]

I feel like I should be involved in a GAN for an article with "SMS" in the title, one way or another. Parsecboy (talk) 12:10, 9 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Not much to nitpick:

I find the subdivision of the service history confusing - the paragraph before the first subheader is all context to that battle, so it seems odd to split it from the actual battle
I might trim "Kingdom of" and just refer to it as Italy
- When I remember to do it; I prefer to use the full names of countries that have changed their governmental types so that readers can learn that Putin's Russia isn't that of the Tsars, however much the former would wish it so.--Sturmvogel 66 (talk) 01:51, 13 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]
There's an odd mix of "English (German translation)" and "German (English translation)" - I'd standardize one way or the other. Parsecboy (talk) 18:25, 9 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]
- See if everything's done to your satisfaction. I think that I've caught all the usages of Entente, etc.--Sturmvogel 66 (talk) 01:51, 13 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]
  - Added the most important stuff from Bilzer.--Sturmvogel 66 (talk) 22:53, 13 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]
    - Looks good to me - there's a bit more that can be added on her late 1914/early 1915 activities, but it's not a big deal, and it can always be done before an ACR. Parsecboy (talk) 12:16, 16 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]