Talk:SMS Leopard/GA1
Appearance
GA Review
[edit]GA toolbox |
---|
Reviewing |
Article (edit | visual edit | history) · Article talk (edit | history) · Watch
Reviewer: Krishna Chaitanya Velaga (talk · contribs) 01:23, 20 November 2016 (UTC)
Well constructed, will come back shortly. Regards, Krishna Chaitanya Velaga (talk • mail) 01:23, 20 November 2016 (UTC)
- Section 1; Consistency maintained, all the parameters—Displacement, Length, Beam, Draft, Power, Propulsion, Speed, Armament and armor—seem fine. Conversion templates and link s in right place.
- Section 2; para 1; The commissioning date is never mentioned. Is it not available?
- Not that I've seen anywhere - Conway's just gives the completion date, which is probably not the same. It's probably available in Sieche's book but I haven't been able to get my hands on a copy - there aren't many in the US.
- Section 2; para 1; Is it necessary to mention the 1875 to Don Juan d'Austria, as it is already linked previously.
- Good catch, that one had been linked, and apparently I didn't remove all of it when I de-linked it.
- Section 2; para 3; then-Captain Anton Haus; suggest mentioning that Haus was the Commander of the Navy later, in parenthesis.
- Good idea
- Lead; it is mentioned that she was armed with ten 47 mm (1.9 in) guns, but in the prose it was four 47 mm (1.9 in) quick-firing guns and six 47 mm revolver cannon, aren't these two different?
- Yes, but for the purposes of the lead, it's ok to summarize them that way since they are all 47 mm guns.
- Regards, Krishna Chaitanya Velaga (talk • mail) 11:27, 27 November 2016 (UTC)
- Thanks for another review. Parsecboy (talk) 12:57, 28 November 2016 (UTC)
- It is reasonably well written.
- It is factually accurate and verifiable.
- a (reference section): b (citations to reliable sources): c (OR): d (copyvio and plagiarism):
- a (reference section): b (citations to reliable sources): c (OR): d (copyvio and plagiarism):
- It is broad in its coverage.
- a (major aspects): b (focused):
- a (major aspects): b (focused):
- It follows the neutral point of view policy.
- Fair representation without bias:
- Fair representation without bias:
- It is stable.
- No edit wars, etc.:
- No edit wars, etc.:
- It is illustrated by images and other media, where possible and appropriate.
- a (images are tagged and non-free content have fair use rationales): b (appropriate use with suitable captions):
- a (images are tagged and non-free content have fair use rationales): b (appropriate use with suitable captions):
- Overall:
- Pass/Fail:
- Regards, Krishna Chaitanya Velaga (talk • mail) 13:01, 28 November 2016 (UTC)
- Pass/Fail: