Jump to content

Talk:SMS Hansa (1898)

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Good articleSMS Hansa (1898) has been listed as one of the Warfare good articles under the good article criteria. If you can improve it further, please do so. If it no longer meets these criteria, you can reassess it.
Good topic starSMS Hansa (1898) is part of the Protected cruisers of Germany series, a good topic. This is identified as among the best series of articles produced by the Wikipedia community. If you can update or improve it, please do so.
Article milestones
DateProcessResult
May 12, 2012Good article nomineeListed
September 9, 2012Good topic candidatePromoted
Current status: Good article

GA Review

[edit]
GA toolbox
Reviewing
This review is transcluded from Talk:SMS Hansa (1898)/GA1. The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.

Reviewer: Thurgate (talk · contribs) 22:08, 11 May 2012 (UTC)[reply]


GA review (see here for criteria)
  1. It is reasonably well written.
    prose: (MoS):
  2. It is factually accurate and verifiable.
  3. It is broad in its coverage.
    a (major aspects): b (focused):
  4. It follows the neutral point of view policy.
    Fair representation without bias:
  5. It is stable.
    No edit wars etc.:
  6. It is illustrated by images, where possible and appropriate.
    a (images are tagged and non-free images have fair use rationales): b (appropriate use with suitable captions):
  7. Overall:
    Pass/Fail:

Comments

[edit]

1. Fürst Bismarck cleared for action. Suggest - I may be being dim here but did the ships have to use force to stop the Russian ships from leaving?

No, but sending the ships to battle stations was intended to send a message, which was received loud and clear on the Russian ships. Parsecboy (talk) 12:13, 12 May 2012 (UTC)[reply]

2. In the references I'm guessing von Mullenheim-Rechberg is supposed to be spelt using a small v?

Yeah, the "von" is always lowercase. Parsecboy (talk) 12:13, 12 May 2012 (UTC)[reply]

I've put the article on hold for seven days to allow you to address the issues I've brought up. Feel free to contact me on my talk page, or here with any concerns. Thurgate (talk) 22:08, 11 May 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Passed. Good job Parsec. Thurgate (talk) 21:07, 12 May 2012 (UTC)[reply]