Talk:SMS Erzherzog Ferdinand Max (1865)

SMS Erzherzog Ferdinand Max (1865) has been listed as one of the Warfare good articles under the good article criteria. If you can improve it further, please do so. If it no longer meets these criteria, you can reassess it.

SMS Erzherzog Ferdinand Max (1865) is part of the Ironclads of Austria-Hungary series, a good topic. This is identified as among the best series of articles produced by the Wikipedia community. If you can update or improve it, please do so.

Article milestones
Date	Process	Result
May 3, 2016	Good article nominee	Listed
December 22, 2018	Good topic candidate	Promoted

Current status: Good article

Ships

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Ships, a project to improve all Ship-related articles. If you would like to help improve this and other articles, please join the project, or contribute to the project discussion. All interested editors are welcome. To use this banner, please see the full instructions.ShipsWikipedia:WikiProject ShipsTemplate:WikiProject ShipsShips articles

Military history: Maritime

This article is within the scope of the Military history WikiProject. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the project and see a list of open tasks. To use this banner, please see the full instructions.Military historyWikipedia:WikiProject Military historyTemplate:WikiProject Military historymilitary history articles

Associated task forces:
/
	Maritime warfare task force

GA Review

This review is transcluded from Talk:SMS Erzherzog Ferdinand Max (1865)/GA1. The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.

Reviewer: Wilhelmina Will (talk · contribs) 10:15, 25 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

GA criteria

Well-written:

The article complies with MOS policies on layout and grammar. Herein dwells the greatest dictionary ever composed! (talk) 09:11, 3 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]

(a) the prose is clear, concise, and understandable to an appropriately broad audience; spelling and grammar are correct

(b) it complies with the Manual of Style guidelines for lead sections, layout, words to watch, fiction, and list incorporation

Verifiable with no original research:

The article makes full use of the three reputable publications in its bibliography. No sign of original research. Herein dwells the greatest dictionary ever composed! (talk) 09:10, 3 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]

(a) it contains a list of all references (sources of information), presented in accordance with the layout style guideline

(b) reliable sources are cited inline. All content that could reasonably be challenged, except for plot summaries and that which summarizes cited content elsewhere in the article, must be cited no later than the end of the paragraph (or line if the content is not in prose)

(c) it contains no original research

Broad in its coverage:

The article seems to sufficiently cover all encyclopedic aspects of its topic for which reliable information could be obtained. Herein dwells the greatest dictionary ever composed! (talk) 09:09, 3 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]

(a) it addresses the main aspects of the topic

(b) it stays focused on the topic without going into unnecessary detail (see summary style)

Neutral: it represents viewpoints fairly and without editorial bias, giving due weight to each.

The article's tone remains neutral throughout. Herein dwells the greatest dictionary ever composed! (talk) 09:08, 3 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Stable: it does not change significantly from day to day because of an ongoing edit war or content dispute.

Since its creation just over two months ago, this article has not endured any edit warring or similarly disruptive editing. Herein dwells the greatest dictionary ever composed! (talk) 08:37, 3 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Illustrated, if possible, by media such as images, video, or audio:

Both images used in this article are public domain, thereby do not risk fair use violation. Both serve relevant illustrative purposes with regards to the topic. Herein dwells the greatest dictionary ever composed! (talk) 08:37, 3 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]

(a) media are tagged with their copyright statuses, and valid non-free use rationales are provided for non-free content

(b) media are relevant to the topic, and have suitable captions

The article qualifies as GA, and it's about time this review was finished. Congratulations! Herein dwells the greatest dictionary ever composed! (talk) 09:13, 3 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]