Jump to content

Talk:SMS Charlotte

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Good articleSMS Charlotte has been listed as one of the Warfare good articles under the good article criteria. If you can improve it further, please do so. If it no longer meets these criteria, you can reassess it.
Good topic starSMS Charlotte is part of the Screw corvettes of Germany series, a good topic. This is identified as among the best series of articles produced by the Wikipedia community. If you can update or improve it, please do so.
Article milestones
DateProcessResult
July 29, 2018Good article nomineeListed
October 12, 2019Good topic candidatePromoted
Current status: Good article

GA Review

[edit]
GA toolbox
Reviewing
This review is transcluded from Talk:SMS Charlotte/GA1. The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.

Reviewer: Courcelles (talk · contribs) 03:35, 29 July 2018 (UTC)[reply]


  • I love reading about ships for some reason, so another won't hurt anyone. Courcelles (talk) 03:35, 29 July 2018 (UTC)[reply]
    • That works out well for us, seeing as I like writing about them ;)
  • "The ship's hulls was" Hulls was, subject-very agreement.
    • Good catch - I tend to copy sections like that from article to article and adjust as necessary, but I missed that one.
  • "The ship was powered by a pair of 2-cylinder marine steam engine " engines?
    • Fixed
  • "ducted into two retractable funnel" Funnels?
    • Yup
  • "20,000 dollars" Which dollar? US I assume?
    • That's a good question - Hildebrand et al usually refer to prices in marks, but they just state that one of the demands was a "Zahlung einer Entschaedigung von Dollar 20.000". I'd have to assume they're referring to USD, but I don't know for sure.
  • "decommissioned for the last time on 31 March 1909 " The next paragraph indicates this wasn't the last time...
    • Good point - I was thinking it was the last time of her normal career, but I see that could be confusing and isn't strictly correct.
  • Good little article you have here. Well done. Courcelles (talk) 03:48, 29 July 2018 (UTC)[reply]