Talk:SMS Babenberg/GA1

GA Review

Article (edit | visual edit | history) · Article talk (edit | history) · Watch

Reviewer: Sturmvogel 66 (talk) 15:39, 21 April 2010 (UTC) GA review – see WP:WIAGA for criteria

---

See the comments for the SMS Habsburg article.

1. Is it reasonably well written?

   A. Prose quality:

   B. MoS compliance:

2. Is it factually accurate and verifiable?

   A. References to sources:

   B. Citation of reliable sources where necessary:

   C. No original research:

3. Is it broad in its coverage?

   A. Major aspects:

   B. Focused:

4. Is it neutral?

   Fair representation without bias:

5. Is it stable?

   No edit wars, etc:

6. Does it contain images to illustrate the topic?

   A. Images are copyright tagged, and non-free images have fair use rationales:

   B. Images are provided where possible and appropriate, with suitable captions:

7. Overall:

   Pass or Fail:

Copyedit done. Buggie111 asked me to check this one out. All is well now. NielsenGW (talk) 02:26, 22 April 2010 (UTC)

Needs information for the Halpern book.--Sturmvogel 66 (talk) 03:54, 30 April 2010 (UTC)