Talk:SMSS J031300.36−670839.3

Astronomy: Astronomical objects Low‑importance

	Astronomy portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Astronomy, which collaborates on articles related to Astronomy on Wikipedia.AstronomyWikipedia:WikiProject AstronomyTemplate:WikiProject AstronomyAstronomy articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.
	This article is supported by WikiProject Astronomical objects, which collaborates on articles related to astronomical objects.

Articles for creation

	This article was reviewed by member(s) of WikiProject Articles for creation. The project works to allow users to contribute quality articles and media files to the encyclopedia and track their progress as they are developed. To participate, please visit the project page for more information.Articles for creationWikipedia:WikiProject Articles for creationTemplate:WikiProject Articles for creationAfC articles
	This article was accepted on 28 September 2014 by reviewer Rcsprinter123 (talk · contribs).

13.6 GYr ago or 100 MYr after B.B. ?

The article assumes time since BigBang to be 13.7 GYr, a value as good as any. But 14.0 GYr is as good. Now 13.6 GYr + 100 MYr equals 13.7 GYr. But what two values would sum up to 14.0 GYr? 13.9 GYr + 100 MYr or 13.6 GYr + 400 MYr? Which of the two values 13.6 GYr and 100 MYr is the solid one? Hilmer B (talk) 20:03, 30 May 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Spectral classification and size

The article claims it is a red giant but the size given in the info box is V, that is a main sequence sub-giant.2A00:23C8:8F9E:4801:B08F:DB9E:233F:7A8A (talk) 16:20, 13 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

I took out the K9V. It doesn't appear to be in the given reference and even if it was it would be very surprising for a CEMP star. Even just calling it K would be a stretch since it has very weak spectral lines. Lithopsian (talk) 18:39, 13 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]