Jump to content

Talk:SIS Building/GA1

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

GA Review

[edit]

Article (edit | visual edit | history) · Article talk (edit | history) · Watch

Reviewer: MWright96 (talk · contribs) 06:29, 19 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Reviewing this article. MWright96 (talk) 06:29, 19 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

  1. It is reasonably well written.
    a (prose): b (MoS for lead, layout, word choice, fiction, and lists):
  2. It is factually accurate and verifiable.
    a (reference section): b (citations to reliable sources): c (OR):
  3. It is broad in its coverage.
    a (major aspects): b (focused):
  4. It follows the neutral point of view policy.
    Fair representation without bias:
  5. It is stable.
    No edit wars, etc.:
  6. It is illustrated by images and other media, where possible and appropriate.
    a (images are tagged and non-free content have fair use rationales): b (appropriate use with suitable captions):
  7. Overall:
    Pass/Fail:

Background

[edit]
  • Change modernizing to modernising
  • The acronyms of the National Audit Office need to be included in brackets

Design and construction

[edit]
  • Remove the duplicate link to the National Audit Office
  • £152.6m and £135.05m should both be changed to £152.6 million and £135.05 million
  • 12,000 m2 needs a convert template with the square feet measurement included

Recent history

[edit]
  • Writing in The Telegraph after the attack, - Should be The Daily Telegraph for consistency

References

[edit]

That is what I found. On hold. MWright96 (talk) 13:22, 19 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

@MWright96: Thank you, I've made all of your suggested changes. Gareth E. Kegg (talk) 16:29, 19 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Nice. Happy to promote to GA class. MWright96 (talk) 16:47, 19 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]