Talk:SIS Building/GA1
Appearance
GA Review
[edit]GA toolbox |
---|
Reviewing |
Article (edit | visual edit | history) · Article talk (edit | history) · Watch
Reviewer: MWright96 (talk · contribs) 06:29, 19 August 2016 (UTC)
Reviewing this article. MWright96 (talk) 06:29, 19 August 2016 (UTC)
- It is reasonably well written.
- It is factually accurate and verifiable.
- a (reference section): b (citations to reliable sources): c (OR):
- a (reference section): b (citations to reliable sources): c (OR):
- It is broad in its coverage.
- a (major aspects): b (focused):
- a (major aspects): b (focused):
- It follows the neutral point of view policy.
- Fair representation without bias:
- Fair representation without bias:
- It is stable.
- No edit wars, etc.:
- No edit wars, etc.:
- It is illustrated by images and other media, where possible and appropriate.
- a (images are tagged and non-free content have fair use rationales): b (appropriate use with suitable captions):
- a (images are tagged and non-free content have fair use rationales): b (appropriate use with suitable captions):
- Overall:
- Pass/Fail:
- Pass/Fail:
Background
[edit]- Change modernizing to modernising
- The acronyms of the National Audit Office need to be included in brackets
Design and construction
[edit]- Remove the duplicate link to the National Audit Office
- £152.6m and £135.05m should both be changed to £152.6 million and £135.05 million
- 12,000 m2 needs a convert template with the square feet measurement included
Recent history
[edit]- Writing in The Telegraph after the attack, - Should be The Daily Telegraph for consistency
References
[edit]- no dead links
- References 10 and 15 are bare urls
That is what I found. On hold. MWright96 (talk) 13:22, 19 August 2016 (UTC)
- @MWright96: Thank you, I've made all of your suggested changes. Gareth E. Kegg (talk) 16:29, 19 August 2016 (UTC)
- Nice. Happy to promote to GA class. MWright96 (talk) 16:47, 19 August 2016 (UTC)