Talk:SEAT Ibiza

Automobiles C‑class Low‑importance

	Cars portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Automobiles, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of automobiles on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.AutomobilesWikipedia:WikiProject AutomobilesTemplate:WikiProject AutomobilesAutomobile articles
C	This article has been given a rating which conflicts with the project-independent quality rating in the banner shell. Please resolve this conflict if possible.
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Spain

	Spain portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Spain, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Spain on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.SpainWikipedia:WikiProject SpainTemplate:WikiProject SpainSpain articles
???	This article has not yet received a rating on the project's importance scale.

Brands

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Brands, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of brands on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.BrandsWikipedia:WikiProject BrandsTemplate:WikiProject BrandsBrands articles
???	This article has not yet received a rating on the project's importance scale.

Split up the section 'Specifications for all variants'?

I believe having the specifications for all generations summed into one single section - i.e. the section 'Specifications for all variants' - is not any more convenient neither to structure of other car articles nor to the structure of the SEAT Ibiza article itself. IMO we should consider splitting up the section 'Specifications for all variants' since each Ibiza generation section should have its own dedicated subsection with specifications, first because it is easier to read and find those in their relevant generation section rather than having them at the end of the whole article, and second because this way each generation section shall gain more space and be more distinct thus easier to read.(LeonCR (talk) 06:41, 15 February 2011 (UTC))[reply]

Support - makes sense. Oh, and new conversations should really go at the bottom of the talk page. ⊂| Mr.choppers |⊃ (talk) 19:57, 15 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]

OK. I am rearranging the article and adding further info on the engines specifications based on other language Wikipedia artcles. (LeonCR (talk) 16:31, 17 February 2011 (UTC))[reply]

Citation needed for Ibiza Mk1's sales

You will find the information you need in the following link: http://media.seat.com/en/seat-news/2009/410-25-anos-de-exito.html "...From its launch in 1984 until 1993, sales of the first generation Ibiza totalled 1,342,001 units. ..." —Preceding unsigned comment added by 94.71.151.236 (talk) 14:23, 1 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks, I've added a citation. Letdorf (talk) 14:29, 1 March 2010 (UTC).[reply]

Model dates

I have been looking though this article and I think that the dates are wrong. I thought the MK2 was 93 - 99 and Mk3 was 99 - 02 and the latest Mk4 is 02 on.

This is correct as I have just bought a Mk4 Ibiza, this needs to be edited to reflect this error, I may do it this afternoon Kicken18 12:39, 12 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]

The widely regarded versions are: Mk 1 pre 1993 Mk 2 1993 - 1999 Mk 3 2000 - 2002 Mk 4 2002 - 2008 Mk 5 2008 - present —Preceding unsigned comment added by 85.158.139.99 (talk) 15:28, 19 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]

"Mark numbers" are not official SEAT designations, so they have the problem of ambiguity and confusion, as there is with the Polo. The only unambiguous way to identify different generations of the Ibiza is by using the VW Group type numbers (i.e. 6K, 6L, 6J). Letdorf (talk) 20:39, 19 July 2010 (UTC).[reply]

Pumpe Duse

I have just added a small bit about PD engines in the mk4 section. Hope it looks ok, was my first proper entry into WIKI YAY Kicken18 12:40, 23 April 2007 (UTC) test[reply]

Ibiza 2.0

no está mencionado el ibiza 2.0 que es a gasolina —The preceding unsigned comment was added by 189.164.172.241 (talk) 23:43, 2 May 2007 (UTC).[reply]

This version of the car is made specifically for the Mexican market, the 2.0L 8V engine has been used in the last two generations(Mk3 and Mk4) of the Ibiza sold in Mexico. 148.206.91.172 (talk) 16:47, 19 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Mark2 image

I believe better image of the Seat Ibiza Mk2 is needed. Emerge.life 13:44, 11 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Under construction tag

Hi, I placed the Under construction tag on the article, but I may not be able to continue editing it for upto a week, but if I happen to forget, kindly message me on my talk page to resume it, thanks 78.32.143.113 (talk) 11:26, 2 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Seat Ibiza hatchback 1.6 TDI CR Sport

A new 1.6 TDI CR diesel engine was made available around June 2009. In the UK its 105 PS but I believe there may be a 90 PS version available elsewhere. Some details about this probably need updating on the Volkswagen platforms page too. Justmehere (talk) 07:53, 19 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]

In Germany, a 90 hp version has already been introduced, the 105 hp PD TDI is no longer available, the 105 hp CR TDI is supposed to be available soon. Alexander Noé (talk) 12:27, 17 October 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Marks

EDIT note - Years of manufacture for UK SEAT IBIZA's appear incorrect. Mk 2 is 1993-99, Mk3 is 2000-02, Mk 4 is 2002-2008 and current model is from 2008 onwards and is Mk 5 (not Mk 4 as shown). See http://www.seatcupra.net/forums/index.php for details.81.158.5.148 (talk) 12:37, 10 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]

This is why we should try not to use "marks" - they are subjective. What you call Mk3 the article refers to as a facelifted Mk2. SEAT themselves call it the 6K2, which is the only verifiable info and thus suggests either removing the marks entirely or perhaps leaving it as it is. ⊂| Mr.choppers |⊃ (talk) 16:44, 10 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]

SEAT Ibiza Bimotor

I wonder if the SEAT Ibiza Bimotor race car should have a separate article from the SEAT Ibiza Mk1, taking into considerion the amount of - available over the internet - data dedicated to it and to its race history, as well as its significance based on the rare technical specifications that discriminate this not only from the production model but also from other race cars too (two engines, two gearboxes etc). After all if the SEAT Ibiza main article grows too much, then again there will be a need for splitting the various sections into separate articles.(LeonCR (talk) 23:37, 3 January 2012 (UTC))[reply]

Support, If you are going to write decent article of it, as this Ibiza article seems to be quite long already.-->Typ932 ^T·C 05:15, 4 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]

5th generation my ****!!!

that's a *** restyle of 4th generation ibiza you *** morons!! — Preceding unsigned comment added by 95.136.37.24 (talk) 00:40, 18 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Yes, some moron created a separate article just for this facelift model and then some "helpful" editor moved all of the junk content into this article. Fixed now. Please consider using nicer language from now on. Mr.choppers | ✎ 13:24, 11 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just added archive links to 3 external links on SEAT Ibiza. Please take a moment to review my edit. You may add {{cbignore}} after the link to keep me from modifying it, if I keep adding bad data, but formatting bugs should be reported instead. Alternatively, you can add {{nobots|deny=InternetArchiveBot}} to keep me off the page altogether, but should be used as a last resort. I made the following changes:

Attempted to fix sourcing for http://media.seat.com/en/seat-news/2009/410-25-anos-de-exito.html
Attempted to fix sourcing for http://spanish.cool-fast-cars.com/selected_news_854
Attempted to fix sourcing for http://media.seat.com/en/seat-news/2005/166.html

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{Sourcecheck}}).

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—^{cyberbot II}_{Talk to my owner:Online} 03:22, 31 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]