Talk:SCR-268 radar

Military history: Technology / North America / United States / World War II

This article is within the scope of the Military history WikiProject. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the project and see a list of open tasks. To use this banner, please see the full instructions.Military historyWikipedia:WikiProject Military historyTemplate:WikiProject Military historymilitary history articles

This article has been checked against the following criteria for B-class status:
Referencing and citation: criterion not met Coverage and accuracy: criterion met Structure: criterion met Grammar and style: criterion met Supporting materials: criterion not met

Associated task forces:
/
	Military science, technology, and theory task force
	North American military history task force
	United States military history task force
	World War II task force

gee where to start, the scr-268 went through numerous vehicle configurations, it seems the signal corps was in a running battle with the quartermaster corps, over trucks and trailers. it wasent till almost the end of the war that the sig corps fanally jurry rigged a lean to shelter over the opperators. the HO-18

the best web site I'v found on the subject is the mobile radar site.97.118.77.199 (talk) 01:20, 22 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Dead link

antiaircraft.org link is dead. Redirect to archive of the site, find a volunteer to bring it back online or redirect to a comparable source? — Preceding unsigned comment added by 71.193.23.181 (talk) 06:14, 11 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Removed comment that needed citation

I added information about how the SCR-268 was combined with the M-4 director. I also removed a paragraphs that made too long of a digression into the SCR-584 and the Tizard Mission, and I removed a paragraph that made a sweeping statement that the SCR-268 was crude technology. Such a statement might be true, but it needs to be backed up by a clear technical discussion with citations. DonPMitchell (talk) 21:44, 15 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]