Talk:SB Centaur/GA1
Appearance
GA Review
[edit]GA toolbox |
---|
Reviewing |
Article (edit | visual edit | history) · Article talk (edit | history) · Watch
Reviewer: Ed! (talk · contribs) 00:57, 12 January 2019 (UTC)
Will look at this one. —Ed!(talk) 00:57, 12 January 2019 (UTC)
- It is reasonably well written:
- No problems with dub or dab links, however, checklink article shows one recently dead link.
- Sigh. It went down seven days ago. Renewed.
- Copyvio tool is showing a yellow light, I suspect it's because of the quote but picking up a few other things too, namely similar phrasing on some sections ("damaged by a tug"; "Dunkirk, Calais, Antwerp, Ostend, Alderney, Bruges and the Netherlands, from a variety of home ports including Dover, Rochester, London, Lowestoft, Goole, Shoreham, Southampton and Newport." Suggest further rearranging some of these phrases.
- They came up when I did a pre-nom check. I thought I had fixed them. I have now. Still a high number, but not due to any avoidable closeness, outside of the quote.
- It is factually accurate and verifiable:
- Source spotchecks Refs 9 and 13 are active and back up material in the article.
- It is broad in its coverage:
- Not Yet
- "moving 150 tons of loose cargo at a time" -- whatever convert unit is best here would be helpful.
- Not Yet
- Convert template added to both instances of "tons".
- "In 1900 there were over 2,000 Thames sailing barges in operation.[4]" -- I imagine these were in private individual employ, vs military, government or large companies? Just want to see if info is out there on it.
- They were all in private ownership, which I have added. (it was in the source.) I can't find a source splitting the size of the owners. My feel from the sources is that most were owned by medium to large concerns, but there is no quantitative data on this.
- World War II: "The rest of the conflict was spent doing war work.[9]" -- Any general idea what this work entailed? And was the boat doing this under private ownership or something else? Should be clear.
- She remained privately owned and doing the same - more or less - as always. Which is why I didn't think to specify. Now specified.
- Owners: Any way we could get that in a table? And are these dates that the boat was sold? Any info on any of the prices?
- I had them in a table and it seemed less readable. I will revert to that if it is a deal breaker. I have clarified what the dates mean.
- It follows the neutral point of view policy:
- Pass No problems there.
- It is stable:
- Pass No problems there.
- It is illustrated by images, where possible and appropriate:
- Pass Images are appropriately cited under CC licenses.
- Other:
- On Hold Pending a few fixes. —Ed!(talk) 01:54, 12 January 2019 (UTC)
- Hi Ed!. Thanks for picking this up. I thought that it was going to languish forever. Your points above all addressed. Gog the Mild (talk) 05:16, 12 January 2019 (UTC)
- I think that works! Passing for GA now. —Ed!(talk) 15:35, 12 January 2019 (UTC)
- Hi Ed!. Thanks for picking this up. I thought that it was going to languish forever. Your points above all addressed. Gog the Mild (talk) 05:16, 12 January 2019 (UTC)