Talk:Sony SAB

	India portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject India, which aims to improve Wikipedia's coverage of India-related topics. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page.IndiaWikipedia:WikiProject IndiaTemplate:WikiProject IndiaIndia articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.
	This article is supported by the Indian television workgroup (assessed as Mid-importance).

Television: Stations Low‑importance

	Television portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Television, a collaborative effort to develop and improve Wikipedia articles about television programs. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page where you can join the discussion. To improve this article, please refer to the style guidelines for the type of work.TelevisionWikipedia:WikiProject TelevisionTemplate:WikiProject Televisiontelevision articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.
	This article is supported by the Television stations task force (assessed as Mid-importance).

Fair use rationale for Image:Sablogo-new.PNG

Image:Sablogo-new.PNG is being used on this article. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is no explanation or rationale as to why its use in this Wikipedia article constitutes fair use. In addition to the boilerplate fair use template, you must also write out on the image description page a specific explanation or rationale for why using this image in each article is consistent with fair use.

Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to insure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If there is other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on the other images used on this page. Note that any fair use images uploaded after 4 May, 2006, and lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.

BetacommandBot (talk) 20:29, 26 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]

please add a new show

Khidki ( खिड़की ) please anyone add this new show .. Ultrastarine (talk) 09:26, 3 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Audience share

Please don't added those audience share stats no more because those are too old stats to use..--- Hamim000000 (talk) 09:26, 1 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Bhakharwadi

I dont want to make this Bhakharwadi page to redirect any longer.please make it to mainpageBhanwar singh vaish (talk)

i dont any longer want to make it redirect.please move it to mainpage Bhanwar singh vaish (talk) 05:36, 21 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]

@Bhanwar singh vaish: Problem is not solved yet the sources you provided in Draft:Bhakharwadi are not reliable as per WP:RS and WP:ICTFSOURCES . The problem is you are not reading the messages left on your talk page. Please read the messages left by @AussieLegend: and @Ravensfire: and you will understand the problem with the article and all your previous edits in general. Here User talk:Robert McClenon#Bhakharwadi your efforts are of no use if you are not following the guidelines properly actually you are just creating more problems like here here and here where you tried to create this article several times. Sid95Q (talk) 01:27, 23 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Requested move 6 April 2019

The following is a closed discussion of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. Editors desiring to contest the closing decision should consider a move review after discussing it on the closer's talk page. No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the move request was: Moved. No opposition and seems reasonable. — Amakuru (talk) 10:07, 15 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]

SAB TV → Sony SAB – Hasn't been SAB TV for 13 years now. I checked, and this one is an acronym, so SAB is correct (the others, like Sony Max, Sony Liv, Sony Pix, etc., are not). — SMcCandlish ☏ ¢ 😼 00:20, 6 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]

PS: We have a bunch of redundant micro-stubs on this whole family of stations, e.g. separate pages for the "1", "2", "3", etc. variants of a station, and for its HD stream. None of these are separate stations in any meaningful, encyclopedic sense (like programming and editorial control, countries served, etc.) These should all merge to their parent articles. They're also being linked to in excessively long and detailed lists inside infoboxes. See cleanup example here. — SMcCandlish ☏ ¢ 😼 01:51, 6 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on this talk page or in a move review. No further edits should be made to this section.

Why sony sab logo is changed

Why sab logo is changed 103.173.46.95 (talk) 07:15, 25 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Edit being undone

Once, I edited this article, and I thought it looked perfect. The next time, I saw that it was still with errors. Upon that, no one must undo my (or others) actions. I actually didn't know how it happened, but I'm pretty sure it's someone else. Note: I actually redone the edit, but it's just for next time. This also applies to all other Wikipedia articles, also in different languages. I mostly edit English articles. But no one shall undo edits in other articles. Hope you understood! FishSticks76 (talk) 14:52, 10 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Undoing edit

Once, I tried to edit this article. Next, I thought it was weird because I didn't want an article. I wanted the entire list, but I couldn't, so I left it. Is that okay? FishSticks76 (talk) 15:04, 10 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]