Talk:Sézary disease

	Medicine portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Medicine, which recommends that medicine-related articles follow the Manual of Style for medicine-related articles and that biomedical information in any article use high-quality medical sources. Please visit the project page for details or ask questions at Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Medicine.MedicineWikipedia:WikiProject MedicineTemplate:WikiProject Medicinemedicine articles
Mid	This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale.
	This article is supported by the Dermatology task force.

Ideal sources for Wikipedia's health content are defined in the guideline Wikipedia:Identifying reliable sources (medicine) and are typically review articles. Here are links to possibly useful sources of information about Sézary disease.

PubMed provides review articles from the past five years (limit to free review articles)
The TRIP database provides clinical publications about evidence-based medicine.
Other potential sources include: Centre for Reviews and Dissemination and CDC

Broken references

Citation [4] leads to a broken link/unregistered domain--could also stand for a more recent reference ("no known causes of Sezary's") as this one is from 2008 anyway --Actually, many of the references cite sezary.com, which is no longer a registered domain. Chengjason7 (talk) 05:21, 9 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Treatment section?

Unsure if I'm reading this wrong (little knowledge of the subject), but the abstract of the cited article [11] for the first sentence of "Treatment" along with the linked articles for Vorinostat and Romidepsin don't seem to indicate that the two drugs are second-line--in fact, the article's abstract seems to indicate that HDAC inhibitors/HDI are first-line, with chemo etc being second options.Chengjason7 (talk) 05:26, 9 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]

If this is untrue, should the first-line options be also listed? The wording in the treatment section seems unclear/disorganized in general, with the last sentence being a standalone direct quote from the oncology journal the sentence cites [18] Chengjason7 (talk) 05:26, 9 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]

rewording direct quotations from citations

lots of sentences here are direct quotes from the references they cite, with [2] being the main source--this includes the first sentence of the Epidemiology section, which is also about MF and not totally relevant to the epidemiology of Sezary. Removed that sentenceChengjason7 (talk) 05:30, 9 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]