Talk:Sälen/Scandinavian Mountains Airport

This article is within the scope of the Aviation WikiProject. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the project and see lists of open tasks and task forces. To use this banner, please see the full instructions.AviationWikipedia:WikiProject AviationTemplate:WikiProject Aviationaviation articles

This article has been checked against the following criteria for B-class status:
Referencing and citation: criterion not met Coverage and accuracy: criterion not met Structure: criterion met Grammar and style: criterion met Supporting materials: not checked

This article is supported by the airport project.

Norway

	Norway portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Norway, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Norway on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.NorwayWikipedia:WikiProject NorwayTemplate:WikiProject NorwayNorway articles
???	This article has not yet received a rating on the project's importance scale.

Sweden Low‑importance

	Sweden portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Sweden, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Sweden-related articles on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.SwedenWikipedia:WikiProject SwedenTemplate:WikiProject SwedenSweden articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

"Take to talk", why don't you

Your section about tourist attractions in the general area is original research, unsourced and no matter what irrelevant in an article about an airport. People pick mushrooms in the forest. No shit. "Take to Wikitravel". 83.253.126.40 (talk) 19:16, 31 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

"The first airport in the world built without an air traffic control tower"?

This claim seems wildly inaccurate. Non-towered airports exists throughout the world, and the United States has 20,000 alone. Additionally, while new, this airport will not be the first place the virtual tower technology was applied to.

I'm considering removing that claim unless someone can clarify what it means. It seems horribly incorrect at face value. Viero223 (talk) 07:33, 5 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

The claim is sourced in a Swedish article (google translation at [1]). What I assume that article is trying to say (or what got lost in the machine translation) is that it is the first new airport to have had only a virtual tower from day one. Certainly there are plenty of airports with no tower, no doubt including many minor airports that have never had any form of ATC. Unless anyone has any better explanation, I suggest changing the text along the lines "the first new airport designed for virtual tower operation from the outset". Rosbif73 (talk) 07:45, 5 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]